Vector diagram - particle collision

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a vector diagram related to particle collisions, where the conservation of momentum is crucial for determining the correct answer. Participants initially debate whether the problem pertains to classical or quantum mechanics, with a consensus leaning towards classical mechanics. The key point is that the momenta represented by the numbers 1, 2, 3, and 4 in the diagram are misunderstood as velocities rather than momenta. Ultimately, the correct application of the head-to-tail rule for vector addition clarifies the solution, confirming that option C is indeed the right choice. Understanding the distinction between momentum and velocity is essential for solving such problems accurately.
jsmith613
Messages
609
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



see attached image

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



So I know as it is a VECTOR diagram it must either be B or C

So I checked that 1, 2, 3, 4 all pointed in the correct directions and they do in both diagrams.
I chose B (but at random) and the answer was C.
Why is the answer C?

thanks
 

Attachments

  • VectorQuestion.png
    VectorQuestion.png
    13.9 KB · Views: 591
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi jsmith! :smile:

Use the conservation of momentum, this tells you the initial total momentum should be equal to the final total momentum. In which of the options, do you see this??
 
jsmith613 said:

Homework Statement



see attached image

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



So I know as it is a VECTOR diagram it must either be B or C

So I checked that 1, 2, 3, 4 all pointed in the correct directions and they do in both diagrams.
I chose B (but at random) and the answer was C.
Why is the answer C?

thanks

First of all, is this supposed to be a Classical Mechanics question or a Quantum mechanics question? Because if it is Classical mechanics, then the question is impossible. But in Quantum mechanics, it is possible.
 
dimension10 said:
First of all, is this supposed to be a Classical Mechanics question or a Quantum mechanics question? Because if it is Classical mechanics, then the question is impossible. But in Quantum mechanics, it is possible.

? classical mechanism

why is it impossibel?
 
jsmith613 said:
? classical mechanism

why is it impossibel?

I'm assuming the mass is constant?
 
Infinitum said:
Hi jsmith! :smile:

Use the conservation of momentum, this tells you the initial total momentum should be equal to the final total momentum. In which of the options, do you see this??

momentum is consereved in B??
 
jsmith613 said:
momentum is consereved in B??

How is momentum conserved in B :confused:
 
dimension10 said:
How is momentum conserved in B :confused:

resultant momentum of both is in the same direciton, no?
 

Attachments

  • VectorQuestion.png
    VectorQuestion.png
    13.2 KB · Views: 509
jsmith613 said:
resultant momentum of both is in the same direciton, no?

In classical mechanics, you have ##m_1v_{1i}+m_2v_{2i}=m_1v_{1f}+m_2v_{2f}## but that does not hold in the question, so I think it is a Quantum mechanics question...
 
  • #10
jsmith613 said:
resultant momentum of both is in the same direciton, no?

Uh nope, it isn't. And you can't be sure about the direction in B as the exact magnitude and direction of original aren't given.

Also, direction isn't the only necessary factor. The magnitude remains same too. Observe C carefully.
 
  • #11
dimension10 said:
In classical mechanics, you have ##m_1v_{1i}+m_2v_{2i}=m_1v_{1f}+m_2v_{2f}## but that does not hold in the question, so I think it is a Quantum mechanics question...

I just reaslied that i have to apply head-to-tail rule
if I apply this it ALWAYS works for ALL questions that have bothered me in the past
:)
 
  • #12
dimension10 said:
In classical mechanics, you have ##m_1v_{1i}+m_2v_{2i}=m_1v_{1f}+m_2v_{2f}## but that does not hold in the question, so I think it is a Quantum mechanics question...

I believe classical mechanics does hold in the question...
 
  • #13
jsmith613 said:
I just reaslied that i have to apply head-to-tail rule

Yes! That's it! :smile:
 
  • #14
Infinitum said:
I believe classical mechanics does hold in the question...

Then I don't think I understood the question properly. What I understand of it is:

$$v_{1i}=1$$
$$v_{2i}=2$$
$$v_{1f}=3$$
$$v_{2f}=4$$
$$m_1,m_2=\mbox{Constant}$$
 
  • #15
dimension10 said:
Then I don't think I understood the question properly. What I understand of it is:

$$v_{1i}=1$$
$$v_{2i}=2$$
$$v_{1f}=3$$
$$v_{2f}=4$$
$$m_1,m_2=\mbox{Constant}$$

You didn't read the question properly o:)

1, 2, 3, 4 are the momenta before and after collision, not the velocities.
 
  • #16
Infinitum said:
You didn't read the question properly o:)

1, 2, 3, 4 are the momenta before and after collision, not the velocities.

Oh! I didn't see that!
 
Back
Top