Thermal equilibrium through radiation and Stefan Boltzmann

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the application of the Stefan-Boltzmann law in a thought experiment involving two objects placed in a vacuum-filled ellipsoid with perfect mirrors. Initially, it was believed that the differing surface areas of the objects would lead to an imbalance in thermal equilibrium, causing one object to heat the other. However, it was concluded that the assumption of perfect energy transfer between the objects was flawed. The key realization is that not all energy from one object can be focused onto the other due to their finite sizes, which maintains the energy balance and adheres to the second law of thermodynamics. This highlights the complexities of thermal equilibrium in such configurations.
ktoff
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey Guys,

so I had a longish discussion with colleagues and on reddit about thermal equilibrium and the sun and how you cannot heat up anything above the surface temperature of the sun using clever mirrors and stuff.

However, somebody came up with Napkin calculations of the Stefan Boltzmann law and I cannot put my finger on why it is not applicable.

To illustrate the problem I devised a thought experiment.

You place two objects on the focal points of a vacuum filled rotational ellipsoid. The inside of the ellipsoid is a perfect mirror and the objects have the same emissivity but different sizes/surface areas. They start out at the same temperature. And finally the ellipsoid is large with respect to the objects.

Every physics instinct screams at me that the two are at thermal equilibrium and will stay that way. However, given the configuration all the power radiated by one body is absorbed by the other and vice versa. Given the Stefan Boltzmann law, one of the bodies radiates more energy than the other (P=εσAT^4) as the surface area A is different for both bodies.

If this were true, the objects would move away from thermal equilibrium with the large body heating up the small one.

This doesn't make any sense.

So the obvious guess is, you cannot just apply the Stefan Boltzmann law here. The question is: Why?

Thanks for reading so far,
KToff
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
For anyone interested, eventually I figured out where the error is (also thanks to this site: http://tierneylab.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/05/the-second-law-strikes-back/).

The assumption that for a sufficiently large ellipsoid all the energy from one energy hits the other is wrong. No matter how you dimension your ellipsoid, you will never focus the entire energy of a source with a finite size onto a smaller object (as pointed out in the link, not even on an equally sized object).

Thus your energy balance is not simply one Boltzmann-term of absorbed energy minus one Boltzmann term of radiated energy but (unsurprisingly) a radiation equilibrium not violating the 2nd law of thermodynamics.
 
Thread 'Thermo Hydrodynamic Effect'
Vídeo: The footage was filmed in real time. The rotor takes advantage of the thermal agitation of the water. The agitation is uniform, so the resultant is zero. When the aluminum cylinders containing frozen water are immersed in the water, about 30% of their surface is in contact with the water, and the rest is thermally insulated by styrofoam. This creates an imbalance in the agitation: the cold side of the water "shrinks," so that the hot side pushes the cylinders toward the cold...
Back
Top