Problem with SU(3) generators's trace

  • Thread starter Thread starter Einj
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Su(3) Trace
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the correctness of a specific trace relation involving the generators of SU(3) in the adjoint representation. The user questions the equality provided by their professor, which states that the trace of the commutator of two generators multiplied by a third generator equals i(3/2)f^{abc}. They derive a different result, finding a factor of 3 instead of 1/2, leading to confusion about the validity of their reasoning. The Dynkin index for the adjoint representation is confirmed to be 3, suggesting a potential miscommunication with the professor. Clarification from the professor is recommended to resolve the discrepancy.
Einj
Messages
464
Reaction score
59
Hi everyone. I'm not sure this is the correct section for this topic and if not my apologiez.
I'm studying SU(3) and my professor wrote down the following equality:

$$Tr\left(\left[ T^a_8,T^b_8\right] T^c_8\right)=i\frac{3}{2}f^{abc}$$

where Ts are generators of the adjoint representation. I'm not sure this relation is correct and I would like to have your opinion. The Dynkin index of the adjoint representation is 3 so:

$$Tr\left(T^a_8T^b_8\right)=3\delta^{ab}$$

Now, my reasoning is:

$$Tr\left(\left[T^a_8,T^b_8\right]\right)=if^{abd}Tr(T^d_8T^c_8)=if^{abd}3\delta^{dc}=3if^{abc}$$

The difference is just a 1/2 factor but I would like to know if I'm doing something wrong.

Thanks everybody
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The index for SU(3) should be 3 in the adjoint representaion (and N generally). You should probably ask him to clarify.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top