Height And Width of Reflected Pulses (through less dense medium) ?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on analyzing the behavior of reflected and transmitted pulses at the boundary between two strings with different mass per unit lengths. Using the reflection coefficient (r) and transmission coefficient (t), the amplitude and width of the reflected and transmitted pulses can be quantitatively determined. The reflected pulse's amplitude is reduced by a factor of r, while the transmitted pulse's amplitude is increased by a factor of t. Both the reflected and transmitted pulses will be narrower and shorter compared to the incident pulse. Ultimately, the analysis illustrates how the properties of the waves change when transitioning between media of differing densities.
Ted1508
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider the waveform shown below heading towards a boundary between two
strings. Let string 1 have mass per unit length of µ1 = 0.05 kg/m and let string 2
have a mass per unit length µ2 = 0.02 kg/m. Let the tension in both strings be T
= 100N.
-->
____/\____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
string 1 ... string 2

Using the reflection and transmission coefficients, sketch the reflected and
transmitted pulses after the incident pulse has completely passed through the
boundary. How do the width and height of the reflected and transmitted pulses
compare to the incident pulse?

Homework Equations



(Ar + Ai) * cos(wt) = At * cos(wt)
Ai + Ar = At
k(1) * (Ar - At) = -k(2) * Atr

The Attempt at a Solution



r = (v(2) - v(1)) / (v(2) + v(1))
τ = 2*v(1) / (v(1) + v(2)) = 2 / (1 + v(1) / v(2))
v(2) = sqrt( (f * τ) / µ2 ) & vise versa
v(1) / v(2) = sqrt( µ2 /µ1 )
r = (1-0.63)/(1+0.63) = 0.225, t= 1.225

I know the pulse in the lighter string should look like ___ _ /\ _ _ (taller but less wide)

But how do I quantitatively illustrate that the width and height change, and by how much?

Help is definitely appreciaTed!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The width and height of the reflected and transmitted pulses can be determined by using the reflection and transmission coefficients. The reflection coefficient, r, is given by: r = (v2 - v1)/(v2 + v1)where v1 and v2 are the wave velocities in strings 1 and 2 respectively. The transmission coefficient, t, is given by:t = 2v1/(v1 + v2)Using these coefficients, we can determine how the amplitude and width of the reflected and transmitted pulses will change. The amplitude of the reflected pulse will be equal to r times the amplitude of the incident pulse, while the amplitude of the transmitted pulse will be equal to t times the amplitude of the incident pulse. The width of the reflected pulse will be equal to r times the width of the incident pulse, while the width of the transmitted pulse will be equal to t times the width of the incident pulse. Thus, we can conclude that the reflected and transmitted pulses will be both narrower and less tall than the incident pulse.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top