Normal force in circular motion

Thread starter AbsoluteZer0
Start date Dec 1, 2012
Tags

Circular Circular motion Force Motion Normal Normal force

AI Thread Summary

In circular motion, the normal force experienced by a person on a ferris wheel varies depending on their position. At the top of the ferris wheel, the normal force is less than at the bottom due to the gravitational force acting downward, which aids in providing the necessary centripetal force. Conversely, at the bottom, the normal force must counteract gravity and provide the centripetal force, resulting in a greater normal force. The key forces acting on the person include gravity and the normal force, which together determine the net force required for circular motion. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for analyzing forces in circular motion scenarios.

Dec 1, 2012

AbsoluteZer0

Hi,

Suppose we have a fellow on a ferris wheel. Would the normal force be greater on the top or at the bottom of the ferris wheel? I'm thinking that it would be greater at the top, or am I wrong?

Thanks,

Physics news on Phys.org

Dec 1, 2012

Doc Al

Mentor

What's your reasoning? What forces act on the person?

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...

View full post »

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

View full post »