Boltzmann Entropy for micro state or macro state?

AI Thread Summary
Boltzmann entropy is defined for a macrostate through occupancy numbers, with the formula S=k log(Ω{ni}), where Ω represents the number of microstates. The discussion centers on whether interchanging particle labels affects the count of microstates, which would imply that particles are distinguishable. If interchanging labels results in a new microstate, it contradicts the assumption of indistinguishability, leading to a potential zero entropy scenario. The conversation also highlights that energy alone does not define a microstate; momentum plays a crucial role, as each energy state encompasses multiple momentum states. Understanding this relationship is essential for accurately calculating entropy in statistical mechanics.
bikashkanungo
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
From theory, we know that Boltzmann entropy for a given distribution, defined through a set of occupancy numbers {ni}, of the macrostate M, is given by:
S=k log(Ω{ni})
where omega is the number of microstates for the previously given set of occupancy number, {ni} . Assuming that the system is in equilibrium, we get omega to be predominantly the number of microstates which fill up the entire 6ND gamma space.

Using counting principles in the 6 dimensional mu space we get omega to be equal to product(1/[factorial(ni)]).

My question is would interchanging particle labels (such that {ni} does not change) result in a new microstate? If yes, it means that particles are no longer indistinguishable. If no, then entropy becomes zero since there is just 1 microstate for the given {ni} in gamma space.

I would appreciate if anyone clears this doubt.
 
Science news on Phys.org
I think energy does not completely define a microstate. Momentum does. So each energy state has a number of momentum states and these particles are distinguishable by their momentum (but again, not by any "identity"). You have to take this degeneracy into account.
 
Back
Top