Basic Trigonometry: Explaining the Rules

  • Thread starter Thread starter iknownth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trigonometry
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the definitions of trigonometric functions, specifically sine, cosine, and tangent, in the context of planar geometry. Participants clarify that these definitions are foundational and do not require proof, although they can be derived using the unit circle and properties of similar triangles. There is a debate about the necessity of proving that the ratios of sides remain consistent across triangles with the same angle. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding these definitions rather than viewing them as arbitrary. Overall, the definitions are established as essential components of trigonometry rooted in geometric principles.
iknownth
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
We all know that
sin theta = opposite side / hypotenuse
cos theta = adjacent side / hypotenuse
tan theta = opposite side / adjacent side.
But why? Are there some explanations behind or are they just defined by scientists?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
iknownth said:
But why? Are there some explanations behind or are they just defined by scientists?

What do you mean by "explanations"?

To answer the question, they are the definitions used in planar geometry. There are other (equivalent) ways of defining them, but you'll get the same properties nonetheless.
 
How can one prove that sin theta = opposite side / hypotenuse ?
 
iknownth said:
How can one prove that sin theta = opposite side / hypotenuse ?

I'm assuming planar geometry here. There are two answers:
  1. It is the definition of sine. There is nothing to prove.
  2. The definition is using the unit circle. It which case the proof is immediate from similar triangles.

I guess it's worth asking: what is your definition of sine?
 
pwsnafu said:
It is the definition of sine. There is nothing to prove.

In this case, there is still something to prove. You want to prove also that if two triangles have the same angle, then the quantity opposite side/hypothenuse is the same.
 
micromass said:
In this case, there is still something to prove. You want to prove also that if two triangles have the same angle, then the quantity opposite side/hypothenuse is the same.

Arrgh yes of course.

Where's the brainfart smiley when you need one?
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Back
Top