friction and rolling resistance, and work done queriesby sgstudent Tags: rolling, work energy theorem 

#37
Apr1312, 01:34 PM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 26,167

it depends what the angular speed was just before the net moment was zero
for the trap door, you had to get it moving at that angular speed by using a slightly greater applied moment, and then when you reckoned that the angular speed was just right, you reduced the applied moment so that the net moment was zero 



#38
Apr1512, 01:03 AM

P: 637





#39
Apr1512, 02:16 AM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 26,167

also, if you apply a force to a body that is impeded by friction, then if you stop increasing the force when it balances the friction force, it will stay at that speed forever 



#40
Sep1412, 11:57 PM

P: 637

So firstly, we have our driving wheel on the air and the engine is turned on. So the Free Body Diagram would look like this: http://imgur.com/xVk0w So in this case the net force of the wheel is 0N as F2 and F1 are equal in magnitude. However, about F1, there is a net moment which turns clockwise (F1XL). Then now we put it on the ground and and experiences a friction oppsoing F1 as friction opposes force in a single plane of contact. So now, the Free Body Diagram would look like this: http://imgur.com/Pw1oh From this, since F2F1=0N, so the net force=friction only. While the wheel still has to maintain its clockwise moment so F1L > FrictionL and since L is a constant, so F1>Friction. So from here, it all makes sense to us, but then after thinking again since that friction force that we have been dealing up to now is static friction so shouldn't F1 be equal to friction? But if F1 is equal to the friction, the the wheel would not be able to turn in the first place. So we were stuck at this part with no solution in mind. Could you help us out with this? Thanks 7 



#41
Sep1512, 03:46 AM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 26,167

hi sgstudent!
a driving wheel is one that is forced to turn by a torque from another part of the vehicle a nondriving wheel is one that simply receives a (linear) force from another part of the vehicle, or another vehicle (or animal) so we normally draw the free body diagram of a nondriving wheel with a straight arrow, usually from the centre of the wheel, representing the force while we draw the free body diagram of a driving wheel with a small circular arrow (anywhere), representing the torque alternatively, we can represent that torque by two equal and opposite straight arrows, but although i agree we could place them anywhere, it would be normal to place them equal distances above and below the centre of the wheel … your arrow at the bottom of the wheel may be confusing you, since the bottom of the wheel has no significance of course, as shown, the centre of the wheel will stay where it is, but the wheel's rotation will accelerate in this case, the wheel's rotation will accelerate slower than before (because the friction is an opposing torque about the centre of mass), but the centre of the wheel will (linearly) accelerate do the calculation for this driving wheel, and you should see that there is no difficulty i don't understand why you say "since that friction force that we have been dealing up to now is static friction so shouldn't F1 be equal to friction?" 



#42
Sep1512, 07:47 AM

P: 637

Hi Tiny Tim, it has been a while!
Yup, we have the same defination of the wheel whereby the force is actually turning it. But again for the engine i was thinking the force turing it looks like this: http://imgur.com/8doMX whereby the engine has an axle to push against to turn it. So in air/ice one force (by the engine) would be at the wheel's end and one at the centre of the wheel (equal in magnitude) which prevents it from moving forward? So it is something like this: http://imgur.com/h4wg3 I think this picture would work even if its not a car as wheelchairs use the same pinciples where the person sitting would push the wheel for it to turn. So after googling about this topic for a long while i came across a old post by you haha. This was what you said: A car moves forward because the engine forces the back axle to turn. If the car was on ice, the back wheels would spin, but the rest of the car would be still. The torque from the engine causes a force at the bit of the tyre in contact with the road. So long as that force does not exceed the maximum static friction, that force will equal the actual friction force, and the bit of the tyre in contact with the road will not move. (Newton's first law on that bit of the tyre: zero total force means zero change in movement.) The car will move, because the only external horizontal force on it is the actual friction force. So i understand now that the F engine=Static friction (without slipping though). But if F engine=Static friction, the won't the net moment be 0Nm and as a result, the wheel should not even be able to start turning (if we consider the wheel to be at rest initially). Even if the wheel has a net force which is the friction (http://imgur.com/uMQjk). So I don't understand how the wheel can rotate. The car and wheel experiences a net force but no net moment. So I'm pretty confused about this. Also, another thing that I'm confused is that in the wheelchair/driving wheel example, the wheelchair bound person would push the wheel only at the top, so would that mean the static friction at the bottom would have the same magnitude (http://imgur.com/Kafh6)? What allows this phenomenon to happen since the force is not at the same point of each other? Thanks Tiny Tim, you rock! 



#43
Sep1512, 05:43 PM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 26,167

in all cases, the equations come from two free body diagrams: one for the wheel, and one for the load (or for the wheelandload combined) what do you get? 



#44
Sep1512, 11:23 PM

P: 637





#45
Sep1612, 05:03 AM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 26,167

just do F = ma for the person, and τ = Iα for the wheel (about the centre of the wheel), remembering to include the reaction force ħR in both (it'll be + for one and  for the other) the reaction force is the "internal" (linear) force between the axleandwheels and the body of the wheelchair 



#46
Sep1612, 07:22 AM

P: 637

Hi Tiny Tim, are there any pictures because i can't virtualise that. I was thinking the forces should look like this: http://imgur.com/WNSV7
Firstly, will my F friction = F push? Because of static friction. So using the formula, the net F=F friction for the wheel but for the person on the seat the net F= 0? As for moment of the wheel, it is 0Nm? I'm getting realise confused about this now. Is there a explanation for this concept? Because I'm really curious about this haha. Thanks 



#47
Sep3012, 02:42 PM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 26,167

hi sgstudent!
i'm sorry for the delay for the free body diagram of the person, there's two horizontal forces (i'm ignoring all vertical forces) the push force (same as the reaction force) from the wheel onto the person's arm, and the friction force from the seat together, they make the mass of the person times accelerationfor the free body diagram of the wheelchair, there's three horizontal forces the push force (same as the reaction force) from the person's arm onto the wheel, the friction force from the person onto the seat, and the friction force from the ground together, they make the mass of the wheelchair times accelerationof course, you can also do a free body diagram for the wheel on it own, or for the person and the chair combined (excluding the wheel), or for the person the chair and the wheel all combined (for the wheel on its own, there's also a small friction torque from the axle of the wheel onto the wheel) 



#48
Oct212, 05:34 AM

P: 637

But i thought the Fpush must always be equal to Ffriction as the Ffriction is static friction. So does it mean that the torque of the wheel will be just the friction from the person to the seat? Thanks 



#49
Oct212, 05:43 AM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 26,167





#50
Oct212, 07:04 AM

P: 637





#51
Oct212, 09:00 AM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 26,167

the push force from his arm on the wheel equals the static friction force on the top of the wheel (it's just another name for it) but that doesn't equal either of the other two friction forces (on the seat, and on the ground) unless the acceleration is zero 



#52
Oct912, 06:47 AM

P: 637





#53
Oct912, 09:55 AM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 26,167

anyway, nothing equals anything else unless the acceleration is zero 



#54
Jan413, 08:57 AM

P: 637




Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Rolling Resistance Equations  Introductory Physics Homework  4  
Kill my curiosity  Rolling a ball down a ramp, friction or no friction?  Classical Physics  6  
direction of rolling resistance  Introductory Physics Homework  1  
rolling friction and work done  Introductory Physics Homework  14  
Rolling Resistance  General Physics  11 