Statistical uncertainty of weighted mean


by Brais
Tags: statistical, uncertainty, weighted
Brais
Brais is offline
#1
Nov9-12, 11:56 AM
P: 7
Hello!

I am using physical data to do an analysis (~30k measurements). These measurements include energies, momenta, angles... of particles.
I am calculating a value (call it v) at the end after a lengthy process, and if I introduce all the data into my program I did, the result is vσ.
If, however, I "bin" my events in energy and angle (say I made four bins in total), when I calculate "v", I get v1σ1, v2σ2, v3σ3, v4σ4. Then I combine these values into one using a weighted average (c stands for combined): [itex] v_c = \sum(v_i/\sigma^2_i)/\sum(1/\sigma^2_i)[/itex], and [itex]\sigma_c = 1/\sqrt{\sum(1/\sigma^2_i)}[/itex] (as can be seen here).
When I do this, it turns out that [itex]\sigma_c \simeq \sigma/2[/itex]. How can this be? I am using the same amount of statistics!

Any reply or idea will be very welcome!!

Thank you!

Brais.
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
SensaBubble: It's a bubble, but not as we know it (w/ video)
The hemihelix: Scientists discover a new shape using rubber bands (w/ video)
Microbes provide insights into evolution of human language
chiro
chiro is offline
#2
Nov9-12, 05:52 PM
P: 4,570
Hey Brais.

The wiki article looks straight-forward, but perhaps you could just outline your calculations in a little more detail step by step to show the simplifications and assumptions you used.
Brais
Brais is offline
#3
Nov10-12, 04:49 AM
P: 7
Hi, thanks for your reply!
I am calculating a fit. If I put all my data together I get an error that is higher than that of fitting different sets of points separately and then combining them with a weighted mean.
I didn't do any simplification, just applied the expression seen in wikipedia.

Brais

Stephen Tashi
Stephen Tashi is offline
#4
Nov10-12, 09:28 AM
Sci Advisor
P: 3,175

Statistical uncertainty of weighted mean


Quote Quote by Brais View Post
I didn't do any simplification, just applied the expression seen in wikipedia.
Brais
You are using a formula from that article that applies when you know the standard deviations of the distributions that are involved, but I'd guess that you don't. Your [itex] \sigma_i [/itex] are probably estimators of standard deviations that you computed from the sample. (The term "standard deviation" is ambiguous. It has at least 5 different meanings in statistics, depending on the context where it appears.)
chiro
chiro is offline
#5
Nov10-12, 06:49 PM
P: 4,570
Following Stephen Tashi's post, you should probably just clarify exactly what attribute you are using.
Brais
Brais is offline
#6
Feb1-13, 09:32 AM
P: 7
Hi again!

A long time ago I had to stop this analysis and so my doubt wasn't importantr for some time :)
I use the errors that my minimization algorithm "MINUIT" gives. Unfortunatelly I cannot find anything except that it (obviously) calculates a covariance matrix and error matrix...

Thanks,

Brais


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Bevington and uncertainty of a weighted mean Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics 5
Is the Uncertainty Principle Statistical? And if so... Quantum Physics 16
Statistical Analysis Question: How many measurements to reduce uncertainty? Introductory Physics Homework 0
Statistical Uncertainty for Discrete Events Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics 2
Statistical form of Heisenberg Uncertainty Quantum Physics 2