"Finally, discuss some physical limitations that might ..."


by Jamin2112
Tags: None
Jamin2112
Jamin2112 is offline
#1
Feb6-13, 01:44 PM
Jamin2112's Avatar
P: 864
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

Part (d) of problem 1 here: http://faculty.washington.edu/joelzy...02_W13_hw4.pdf
2. Relevant equations

I have (I(t) I'(t))T = cos(t/√(LC))k1 + sin(t/√(LC))k2, some k1, k2 ε ℂ2 for my solution and so I know that decreasing the value of LC increases the ticking frequency of this clock.

3. The attempt at a solution

But I'm at a loss for what to put for this "discuss some physical limitations" thing. Thoughts?
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Cougars' diverse diet helped them survive the Pleistocene mass extinction
Cyber risks can cause disruption on scale of 2008 crisis, study says
Mantis shrimp stronger than airplanes
rude man
rude man is offline
#2
Feb6-13, 01:54 PM
HW Helper
Thanks
PF Gold
rude man's Avatar
P: 4,429
For one thing - do you think this clock will run forever? Even if so, does the current level stay constant or does it get harder to detect over time? Do the values of R, C and L change in any way over time?
Jamin2112
Jamin2112 is offline
#3
Feb6-13, 02:08 PM
Jamin2112's Avatar
P: 864
Quote Quote by rude man View Post
For one thing - do you think this clock will run forever?
Theoretically, yes.

Even if so, does the current level stay constant or does it get harder to detect over time?
Well, it oscillates, since current is V = RI, R is constant, I is oscillating.

Do the values of R, C and L change in any way over time?
I don't really know since I'm not an electrical engineer

voko
voko is offline
#4
Feb6-13, 02:54 PM
Thanks
P: 5,529

"Finally, discuss some physical limitations that might ..."


I do not see any dependence of the solution on R. How come?
Jamin2112
Jamin2112 is offline
#5
Feb6-13, 03:28 PM
Jamin2112's Avatar
P: 864
Quote Quote by voko View Post
I do not see any dependence of the solution on R. How come?
If we want it to tick with a constant frequency, then we want the node to be a center, so we want R=0. Right? We want I(t)=0 periodically.
rude man
rude man is offline
#6
Feb6-13, 03:43 PM
HW Helper
Thanks
PF Gold
rude man's Avatar
P: 4,429
Quote Quote by Jamin2112 View Post
Theoretically, yes.



Well, it oscillates, since current is V = RI, R is constant, I is oscillating.



I don't really know since I'm not an electrical engineer
Does it seem reasonale to assume that whatever circuit you use to detect the zero crossings of the current has a limitation as to how low the current can be before it can't tell the difference between that low level and zero?

And BTW you can't have R = 0 in real life. Besides, the problem specifies a resistor.

And FYI R, C and L do change over time & environment. That's why crystal oscillators are used in your PC!
voko
voko is offline
#7
Feb6-13, 04:08 PM
Thanks
P: 5,529
Quote Quote by Jamin2112 View Post
If we want it to tick with a constant frequency, then we want the node to be a center, so we want R=0. Right? We want I(t)=0 periodically.
Do you think it is physically possible to have R = 0? The circuit is called LRC for a reason.
Jamin2112
Jamin2112 is offline
#8
Feb6-13, 04:45 PM
Jamin2112's Avatar
P: 864
Quote Quote by voko View Post
Do you think it is physically possible to have R = 0? The circuit is called LRC for a reason.
Isn't my intuition right, though, that we want the vector field of (I I')T to be something circling the origin forever?
voko
voko is offline
#9
Feb6-13, 05:09 PM
Thanks
P: 5,529
Is that possible with R > 0?


Register to reply

Related Discussions
In binary can we have a value with "deci" "centi" "mili" or more lower valued prefix? Computers 14
"In principle" limitations of hidden variable theories Quantum Physics 13
BAM! Finally got my final grade in "University Physics I" Academic Guidance 28
Do you always need to watch out for "limitations?" How do you memorize them? Calculus & Beyond Homework 5
"String Theorists Finally Admit Defeat"!! Beyond the Standard Model 9