Induced charge on a solid metal sphere

AI Thread Summary
A neutral metal sphere enclosed by a uniformly charged metal shell will not induce charges on its surface due to the absence of an electric field within the sphere. The charges on the shell create an electric field, but this field does not penetrate the interior of the shell, resulting in no effect on the neutral sphere. Consequently, the charges on the sphere remain unaffected, maintaining the condition of no electric field inside the sphere. The discussion highlights the principle that electric fields do not influence conductors in electrostatic equilibrium. Therefore, the configuration remains stable without any induced charge on the neutral sphere.
luhar
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
All

I understand clearly that if a metal sphere is charged then the charges must reside on the surface because that is the only way there is no electric field within the metal. However if you imagine a neutral metal sphere, and let's say it is suddenly enclosed by a uniformly charged metal shell concentric with the neutral sphere (radium of shell greater than sphere). In this case will it induce charges on the surface of the neutral sphere? I cannot see how it would since if it does then these would have to reside on the sphere's surface and then the remaining charge of opposite polarity on the sphere would have no place to go! If that is true then it it is a little strange that despite the presence of an electric field on the surface of the sphere (due to the presence of the charged shell) and the free electrons within it nothing happens!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suspect that either nothing will happen, or there will be a layer on top that is negatively charged, followed by a layer immediately below (on atomic scales) that is positively charged. The configuration will somehow adjust itself so that there is no field inside the bulk of sphere. (Note: I could be completely wrong.)

[Motivating source: Jackson's Classical Electrodynamics, section "Some Remarks on Idealizations in Electromagnetism"]
 
no. no. [I was required to submit a least four characters...]
 
luhar said:
All
enclosed by a uniformly charged metal shell concentric with the neutral sphere
There is no E field inside a charged metal shell, so nothing will happen to the enclosed sphere.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top