Continuity equation, partial derivative and differential operators

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the continuity equation and its mathematical representation involving partial derivatives and differential operators. The original poster struggles with interpreting the symbols and transitioning between the equations presented. Key points include the need for clarity on whether density (ρ) is constant, the distinction between vector and scalar quantities, and the ambiguity surrounding the variable v, which could represent different physical quantities. Participants highlight the importance of understanding the mathematical operations involved, such as divergence and gradients, and question the introduction of temperature (T) in the equations. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the complexities of applying mathematical concepts to physical principles in fluid dynamics.
pisgirl
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi all!
I have the following slide, and whilst I understand that the original point is "the rate of density, ρ, in each volume element is equal to the mass flux"...i am totally lost on the mathematics! (And I am meant to be teaching this tomorrow). I do not have any information on what the indivudual symbols refer to, I guess A is area and t is time etc. Can anyone understand this:

-∇(ρv)=\frac{\partial}{\partial t}(ρd\tau) where d\tau=Adx
-∇.v = \frac{\partial}{\partial t} (Adx)
-\frac{\partial v}{\partial x} Adx = \frac{\partial}{\partial t}(Adx)
-\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}=\frac{1}{A} \frac{\partial A}{\partial T}

Unfortunately I am not sure how to even get from line 1 to 2

and how t combine partial with full!

Argh! Thank you in advance!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, pisgirl! :smile:

pisgirl said:
Hi all!
I have the following slide, and whilst I understand that the original point is "the rate of density, ρ, in each volume element is equal to the mass flux"...i am totally lost on the mathematics! (And I am meant to be teaching this tomorrow). I do not have any information on what the indivudual symbols refer to, I guess A is area and t is time etc. Can anyone understand this:

-∇(ρv)=\frac{\partial}{\partial t}(ρd\tau) where d\tau=Adx
-∇.v = \frac{\partial}{\partial t} (Adx)
-\frac{\partial v}{\partial x} Adx = \frac{\partial}{\partial t}(Adx)
-\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}=\frac{1}{A} \frac{\partial A}{\partial T}

Unfortunately I am not sure how to even get from line 1 to 2

and how t combine partial with full!

Argh! Thank you in advance!

I also have difficulty to make sense of these formulas.

I think you can only get from line 1 to line 2 if ρ is independent from both time and location.
Then ρ can be moved outside the differentiation and get canceled.
But I presume ρ is not supposed to be constant?
Would it be dependent on time?

Can you indicate which quantities are supposed to be vectors and which scalar?
And which quantities depend on place and/or time?

Line 2 contains ∇.v making it ambiguous what v represents.
What does it represent?
Volume? Velocity? Specific volume?
Note the difference between ∇v and ∇.v.
The first is a gradient which requires a scalar function and yields a vector.
The second is the divergence which requires a vector function and yields a scalar.

In line 3 we see that it was either
##∇v = (\frac{dv}{dx}, \frac{dv}{dy}, \frac{dv}{dz})##, but where did the other components go then? And where did Adx come from?
##∇ \cdot \mathbf v=\frac{dv_x}{dx} + \frac{dv_y}{dy} + \frac{dv_z}{dz}##.
If we assume ##v_y = v_z = 0##, we're still left with an Adx that comes out of nowhere.

In line 4 suddenly a T pops up.
Temperature?
Or a typo that should have been ##\tau##?
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top