Question about gravitational potential energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the conversion of gravitational potential energy to kinetic energy when a 1000 lb weight freefalls and is then stopped by a mechanical device. The initial calculations suggest the potential energy is 894,289 joules, and the average power during the fall is 53 kW. It is clarified that energy is measured in joules, not watts, and that power can vary based on the time taken to stop the weight. The mechanical device can recover nearly all the energy, but some energy will be lost as heat during the process. Overall, the potential energy remains constant regardless of the stopping time, but the efficiency of energy transfer can vary.
scott22
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I am wondering how this all works and am hoping to get some guidance. If a 1000 lb weight freefalls vertically from 660 ft the energy is 894,289 joules. If the fall is down a 30 degree slope that is 1300 ft long, then it takes 17 seconds and the potential energy can be said to be 53 KW. If, and I really mean if, I did that math right then my question has to do with converting that 53KW into kinetic energy. If the 1000 lb. weight is brought to a stop by a mechanical device, rather than impacting the earth, does the 53KW transfer to the mechanical device? If so does all or most of it transfer? Secondly, if the mechanical device takes longer than the 17 seconds of freefall to bring the weight to a stop is the 53KW of potential energy still available? My guess is that no matter how long the mechanical device takes to bring the weight to a stop the potential energy, of 53KW, would remain the same.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Be careful with terminology: "potential energy can be said to be 53 KW" makes no sense. You mean, the average power is 53 kW. Energy is measured in joules. Energy is conserved and power is not. If you take the same energy and spread it over a longer time, the power will decrease. So your last sentence is totally wrong.

Depending on how efficient the mechanism is, almost all of the 894289 joules can be recovered by the machine. Of course there's always some inefficiency, but there's no hard limit on efficiency like there is in a heat engine.
 
You are talking about a potential energy of 53 KW, energy is measured in Joules, not in Joules per second, which is W.
And if I understand your question correct, yes most of the energy gets converted into mechanical energy but there will also be a not neglible amount of heat after the collision.

Does that answer your question a little bit?
 
If a problem is stated in pounds and feet, please stick with those units when calculating potential energy in foot-pounds.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top