What Are the Viable Alternatives to Electricity for Future Energy Needs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pharrahnox
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electricity
AI Thread Summary
Electricity is currently the most efficient method for energy transmission, widely used in households and industries to convert various energy sources into usable forms. Despite advancements in technology and numerous alternative energy production methods, electricity remains the primary choice due to its cost-effectiveness and ease of transmission. Historical attempts to use alternatives like compressed air and high-pressure water proved less efficient than electricity. The fundamental principles of energy transfer are unlikely to change, as they are governed by natural laws. Therefore, while technology will improve, electricity is expected to dominate future energy needs.
Pharrahnox
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
As technology has advanced, we have come up with ways to produce and use more energy, and have come up with many different ways of doing so.

Most of what I know of using energy for households or factories or big machines is that they use electricity, as a way to convert fuel, heat, wind, light, etc. into electricity, and then into motion, heat, light, sound, etc.

Scientists have come up with heaps of different ways of producing energy in the form of electrity, but will electricity be the main form of energy transmission in the future?

I have tried to research into this, but haven't had any luck. Does anyone know whether or not there is viable alternatives to electricity that might be used in the future because of particular benefits?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Electricity will continue to be used far into the foreseeable future. There simply isn't a better/more efficient method or transferring power/energy to everywhere it needs to go. Like to all your nifty electronic devices around the house.
 
to add on drakkith , it's not about what someone can come up with or what the year outside is it's about what mother nature can offer to us , nature is the way she is and physics rules don't change over the years not even over the centuries or millenia ,
we already have the wheel , we won't be able to make another one , we can just make this one better , longer lasting etc , something like that.

Will technology progress and become faster , safer etc yes it will but will the basic way of how electron movement in a conductor or anything that conducts can transfer power change ? No I don't think so.
 
Pharrahnox said:
As technology has advanced, we have come up with ways to produce and use more energy, and have come up with many different ways of doing so.

Most of what I know of using energy for households or factories or big machines is that they use electricity, as a way to convert fuel, heat, wind, light, etc. into electricity, and then into motion, heat, light, sound, etc.

Scientists have come up with heaps of different ways of producing energy in the form of electrity, but will electricity be the main form of energy transmission in the future?

I have tried to research into this, but haven't had any luck. Does anyone know whether or not there is viable alternatives to electricity that might be used in the future because of particular benefits?

Back in the early 1900's, when people were first starting to transmit power to houses and factories, several methods were tried. These included compressed air, high pressure water, and moving cables. Electricity was found to be far easier and cheaper for transmitting power than these other methods, which is why we use it today. I don't see this changing in the foreseeable future.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top