Question about impulse forces and tipping point of block

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the tipping point of a block when subjected to different forces. The original poster notes that the tipping point is lower when a quick impulse force is applied compared to a slowly applied force. A response clarifies that the tipping equation assumes equilibrium, which is not the case during a rapid strike. This indicates that dynamic forces can alter the tipping behavior of the block. Understanding the difference between static and dynamic conditions is crucial for accurately predicting tipping points.
johnnnnyyy
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Sorry if I am posting this in the wrong place but this is my first post.

I know the equation for tipping of a block when force is slowly added until it either tips of slides is umg=mgL/2h but I have noticed that when you quickly strike the block with your finger, the point at where the block tips becomes much lower. Does anybody know why this is or know what the equation is that explains this?


Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The equation you provided assumes equilibrium. If you strike the block quickly, the block will not be at equilibrium.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top