Determining the weight of material in an excavator bucket.

  • Thread starter Thread starter minethat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Material Weight
AI Thread Summary
To determine the weight of material in an excavator bucket, key factors include the angles of the boom and arm, chassis orientation, and hydraulic pressure. If the excavator is equipped with the necessary sensors, it may already compute the load automatically. Understanding the masses of the arm segments is also crucial for accurate calculations. The relationship between pressure, cross-section, and geometry allows for the calculation of forces and torques involved. Overall, a solid grasp of these principles is essential for effective load measurement.
minethat
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I work in the IT department for a small mining company and recently discovered during some product research that one can determine the weight of material in the bucket when given the following:

The angle of the boom
The angle of the arm
The orientation of the chassis
The hydraulic pressure on the boom and arm

Unfortunately I have a very limited knowledge of physics so thought this would be a great place to get some advice.

Any help or a push in the right direction would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the excavator has the sensors that measure all those values, chances are it already computes the load. Also it seems you would need the masses of the arm segments as well.

Pressure and cross-section gives you the force in the pneumatic cylinders. Geometry gives you the torques that the load counters in the hinges and the lever arm of the load. From this you get the load.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top