Can Polynomials in Two Variables Be Expressed in Different Forms?

AI Thread Summary
Polynomials in two variables can be expressed in different forms, similar to polynomials in one variable. A quadratic polynomial like Q(x,y) can represent various geometric figures such as circles, ellipses, hyperbolas, or parabolas when plotted on the X-Y plane. To determine the specific form, one can calculate the discriminant and rotate the coordinate system to eliminate cross terms, leading to a standard form for the geometric figure. However, factorization of the polynomial Q(x,y) into a product of linear factors is complex and does not have a general solution due to the nature of the resulting equations in the (p,q,r) space. The discussion highlights the challenges in finding a consistent intersection of these equations, suggesting that while alternative forms exist, factorization remains intricate.
Jhenrique
Messages
676
Reaction score
4
If a polynomial of 1 variable, for example: P(x) = ax²+bx+c, can be written as P(x) = a(x-x1)(x-x2), so a polynomial of 2 variables like: Q(x,y) = ax²+bxy+cy²+dx+ey+f can be written of another form?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You have a quadratic in two variables; if you plot it on the X-Y plane it will be a circle, ellipse, hyperbola, parabola, or a pair of lines. You can discover which by writing it in standard form and then calculating the discriminant:
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/QuadraticCurveDiscriminant.html

Once you know the form you can rotate the coordinate system so that the cross terms disappear; use the vanishing of the cross term coefficient as the constraint.

Then put it into "standard form" for the particular geometric figure.

For a circle it will be (u-h)^2/r^2 + (v-g)^2/r^2 = 1, and similar for the other cases.
 
Actually, I'm asking if is possible to factorize the polynomial Q(x,y)!?
 
<br /> (px + qy + r)(sx + ty + u) = psx^2 + (pt + qs)xy + qty^2 + (pu + rs)x + (qu + rt)y + ru<br />

That gives you six equations in six unknowns.

There is no general solution, because you can pretty quickly eliminate s = a/p, t = c/q and u = f/r to end up with <br /> cp^2 + aq^2 = bpq \\<br /> fp^2 + ar^2 = dpr \\<br /> fq^2 + cr^2 = eqr. These are cylinders in (p,q,r) space whose cross-sections are conic sections in the (p,q), (p,r) and (q,r) planes respectively. There is no reason why these should all intersect (it's pretty easy to arrange three such cylinders of circular cross-section so that they don't intersect), and if they do all intersect they may do so at multiple points.
 
Last edited:
pasmith said:
<br /> (px + qy + r)(sx + ty + u) = psx^2 + (pt + qs)xy + qty^2 + (pu + rs)x + (qu + rt)y + ru<br />

That gives you six equations in six unknowns.

There is no general solution, because you can pretty quickly eliminate s = a/p, t = c/q and u = f/r to end up with <br /> cp^2 + aq^2 = bpq \\<br /> fp^2 + ar^2 = dpr \\<br /> fq^2 + cr^2 = eqr. These are cylinders in (p,q,r) space whose cross-sections are conic sections in the (p,q), (p,r) and (q,r) planes respectively. There is no reason why these should all intersect (it's pretty easy to arrange three such cylinders of circular cross-section so that they don't intersect), and if they do all intersect they may do so at multiple points.

Nice!

I thought in something like this:
##Q(x,y) = A(x-a)(x-b) + B(x-c)(y-d) + C(y-e)(y-f)##

Do you have more ideias??
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top