Increase in electric potential energy

AI Thread Summary
When a positive charge A moves towards another stationary positive charge B, A's electric potential energy increases due to the repulsive force between them. However, the potential energy increase is not attributed to either charge independently; rather, it is a result of the configuration of the system as a whole. The total potential energy of the system is defined by the work needed to bring both charges from infinity to their final positions, which is represented by the formula kqAqB/rAB. While both charges experience changes in their electric potential due to their proximity, the concept of potential is unified for the system rather than separate for each charge. Ultimately, the potential energy is a collective property of the system formed by both charges A and B.
Miraj Kayastha
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
If a positive charge A moves towards another stationary positive charge B then the A's electric potential energy increases. But shouldn't the electric potential energy of B also increase as it is also in a way moving towards the A inside the A's electric field?

So shouldn't the total increase in electric potential of the system be the double of the increase in anyone of the charges?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) The potential energy might decrease if the charges A and B are opposite.

2) Assuming A and B are of like charge, the increase in potential energy is held in the configuration of the system A and B together. The potential energy is not attributable to either A or B independently. This is also true for the gravitational potential energy. However, in the case of two objects of disproportionately different sizes, it is often convenient to neglect the motion of one of the objects (the larger one, since it accelerates so little). And in this case, one often talks about "the potential energy of the smaller object" since that's the only motion we care about, when in fact the potential energy is contained in the configuration of the system.
 
The potential energy of the system (of charges A and B) in its final configuration equals the total work that some outside agent has to do, in order to bring both charges from infinity to their final locations.

Start with both A and B at infinity.

Bring charge A to its final location. This requires no work, because charge B is still infinitely far away.

Bring charge B to its final location, a distance rAB from A. This requires work kqAqB/rAB.

The total work and the potential energy are therefore 0 + kqAqB/rAB.
 
But doesn't the potential of A and B increase as A or B gets closer because both of the particles a simultaneously changing their positions in the elctric field of each other?
 
There's just one potential. The potential due to the configuration of A and B. There's no two separate potentials that you are thinking of. There isn't a potential of A and a potential of B, there is just potential of A and B.
 
I was using the Smith chart to determine the input impedance of a transmission line that has a reflection from the load. One can do this if one knows the characteristic impedance Zo, the degree of mismatch of the load ZL and the length of the transmission line in wavelengths. However, my question is: Consider the input impedance of a wave which appears back at the source after reflection from the load and has traveled for some fraction of a wavelength. The impedance of this wave as it...
Back
Top