Can I Push the Moon Instantly?

  • Thread starter Thread starter darrin016
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moon Push
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of pushing the Moon using a hypothetical stick that defies physics. It explores the idea that while one end of the stick could be pushed, the movement of the other end cannot exceed the speed of light, as the impulse travels at the speed of sound within the stick. The analogy of a laser pointer is used to illustrate that while the dot can appear to move faster than light, it does not transmit information at that speed. Ultimately, the consensus is that any physical push or impulse cannot exceed the speed of light, maintaining the principles of physics. The conversation highlights the distinction between perceived motion and actual information transfer in physics.
darrin016
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Can a push, be faster than light?
If I was to hold a stick that stretched out to the moon, and pushed it. Could I push the moon instantly?
Seeing as that the stick could defy physics etc and I had enough strength to make an impact on the moon.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I feel like it's possible. I push one end, the other end needs to move to make room for the stick pushing right?
 
Even though the 'poke' is 'travelling' faster than light, as long as the stick is traveling slower than light, you're okay. If you had a million billion trillion km long stick that you pushed 1mm in 1/100th of a second, nothing would actually be going faster than light. The same idea applies with a laser pointer on the moon. If you flick the dot back and forth really fast on earth, the dot appears to move faster than light.
 
But the push would have to react instantly. How can one end of the stick move, while the end doesn't?
Has to be faster than light
 
See https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=536289
 
Last edited by a moderator:
97313 said:
Even though the 'poke' is 'travelling' faster than light,
It is not. The impulse is traveling at the speed of sound within the rod, which is slower than light. The impulse carries information so it cannot travel faster than light.

97313 said:
The same idea applies with a laser pointer on the moon.
No, it is completely different.

97313 said:
If you flick the dot back and forth really fast on earth, the dot appears to move faster than light.
It doesn't just appear, it is moving faster than light. But the dot carries no information across the surface, so it can move at any speed.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top