Einstein's Relativity: Maths Needed to Understand?

Thread starter cscott
Start date May 27, 2005
Tags

Relativity

AI Thread Summary

Understanding Einstein's "Relativity" can be approached without calculus, as there are accessible treatments of the concepts that do not require advanced mathematics. However, for a deeper comprehension of the theories, a foundational knowledge of calculus is beneficial. Readers seeking a basic grasp of the ideas may start with simpler texts before tackling the complexities of relativity. The discussion highlights that while calculus enhances understanding, it is not strictly necessary for an introductory level of engagement with Einstein's work.

May 27, 2005

cscott

Einstein's "Relativity"

What kind of maths is needed to understand this book? Would I be able to get by without calculus?

Physics news on Phys.org

Jun 18, 2005

lby

maybe……
read an easy one first!

Jul 14, 2005

leright

It all depends on how deep you want to go...you can learn the basic ideas without calculus, but you'll only be scratching the surface.

Aug 14, 2005

mathwonk

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

2024 Award

einstein himself wrote several very nice treatments using no calculus at all.

Thread 'Books with a more theoretical approach to turbulence and DNS'

I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

View full post »

Thread 'Suggestions for Analytic Number Theory textbooks'

Something other than Apostol's book which I find lacking in motivation. Not too advanced, since it is my first encounter with ANT.

View full post »

Thread 'Physics Introduction book'

Hi, I'm an undergraduate physics student and I'm currently in my second week of the first semester. I wonder if I should use Sears and Zemansky's University Physics or Halliday and Resnick's Fundamentals of Physics as my book reference. Which one do you guys think is the best? or if there's any better book out there please let me know! =)

View full post »