Battle of Hastings - October 14, 1066

  • Thread starter Thread starter Astronuc
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the historical context of the Battle of Hastings, which took place on October 14, 1066, marking a significant moment in English history. William of Normandy landed in England to claim the crown, and after defeating King Harold II, who had just triumphed over a Norwegian invasion, William established Norman rule. The composition of Harold's army, hastily gathered and fatigued from previous battles, raised questions about the willingness and effectiveness of such a force. Despite their initial resolve, the army's discipline faltered during the battle. Harold's unexpected death, caused by an arrow, was a pivotal moment that ultimately led to William's victory, underscoring the unpredictable nature of warfare and the consequences of leadership decisions. The discussion highlights the complexities of medieval military dynamics and the impact of individual actions on historical outcomes.
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
22,366
Reaction score
7,202
Another 61 years and it will be the 1000th anniversary.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Hastings
On September 28, 1066, William of Normandy, bent on asserting by arms his claim to the English crown, landed unopposed at Pevensey. Upon setting foot on the beach, William tripped and fell on his face. Saving face, he rose, grabbing handfuls of sand and shouted "I now take hold of the land of England!" On hearing the news, the Saxon King Harold, who had just destroyed the Norwegian army under King Harald Hardråda at the Battle of Stamford Bridge in Yorkshire, hurried southward, gathering what forces he could on the way.

On the morning of Saturday, October 14, Duke William gathered his army below the English position. The Norman army was of comparable size to the English force, and composed of William's Norman, Breton and Flemish vassals along with various Norman nobles and their retainers. The nobles had been promised English lands and titles in return for their material support. The army was deployed in the classic medieval fashion with the Normans taking the centre, the Bretons on the left wing and the Flemish on right wing. Each battle comprised infantry, cavalry and archers along with crossbowmen. The archers and crossbowmen stood to the front for the start of the battle.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/war/normans/hastings_01.shtml

http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/1066malmesbury.html

http://www.regia.org/hastings.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Did the people that composed Harolds army go into battle willingly? and how
effective is a part time army gathered in haste ?
 
wolram said:
Did the people that composed Harolds army go into battle willingly? and how
effective is a part time army gathered in haste ?

Harold has raised his army, by the usual methods of Anglo-Saxon culture, which means that at least the leaders were willing, in order to fight off the other invasion, by Harald Hardraade of Norway. He defeated that invader in the North of England, and then heard about William's invasion, so he marched the army South to Senlac ("Hastings"). The army was pretty frazzled and fractious by that time, which showed in some failures of discpline during the battle. But it was by no means foreordained that Wiliam would win. If Harold hadn't been killed by an arrow that struck him through the eye-slit of his helmet - a complete fluke - the battle could have gone either way.
 
selfAdjoint said:
Harold has raised his army, by the usual methods of Anglo-Saxon culture, which means that at least the leaders were willing, in order to fight off the other invasion, by Harald Hardraade of Norway. He defeated that invader in the North of England,
Only because Harald had only a fraction of his army with him when he spotted Harold's army.
The dumb Norwegian thought he would dishonour himself if he made a hasty retreat to his main forces and gave the signal for a suicidal assault instead..
 
Just ONCE, I wanted to see a post titled Status Update that was not a blatant, annoying spam post by a new member. So here it is. Today was a good day here in Northern Wisconsin. Fall colors are here, no mosquitos, no deer flies, and mild temperature, so my morning run was unusually nice. Only two meetings today, and both went well. The deer that was road killed just down the road two weeks ago is now fully decomposed, so no more smell. Somebody has a spike buck skull for their...
Thread 'In the early days of electricity, they didn't have wall plugs'
Hello scientists, engineers, etc. I have not had any questions for you recently, so have not participated here. I was scanning some material and ran across these 2 ads. I had posted them at another forum, and I thought you may be interested in them as well. History is fascinating stuff! Some houses may have had plugs, but many homes just screwed the appliance into the light socket overhead. Does anyone know when electric wall plugs were in widespread use? 1906 ad DDTJRAC Even big...

Similar threads

Back
Top