Register to reply 
Proportional Segments Theorem 
Share this thread: 
#1
Mar314, 12:28 PM

P: 36

I remember learning this in high school, but I can't track down a proof. Let ABC be a triangle and DE a line segment intersecting the triangle such that D is on AB, E is on AC, and DE is parallel to BC. Then
[tex]\frac{\overline{DE}}{\overline{BC}}=\frac{\overline{AD}}{\overline{AB}} =\frac{\overline{AE}}{\overline{AC}}[/tex] I duckduckgo'd this as much as I could, but no luck. There is a claim for a proof here http://ceemrr.com/Geometry1/Parallel...lar_print.html and I get the proof for the Triangle Midsegment Theorem, but I don't know what they mean when they say that the Proportional Segments Theorem follows from the Triangle Midsegment Theorem by "repeated application." How so? 


#2
Mar314, 12:56 PM

P: 540

You can demonstrate that the two triangles are similar based on AAA (angle, angle, angle)  they share one angle and the parallel side can be used to prove the other two angle are equivalent.
The lengths of corresponding sides of similar triangles follow the same proportions. 


#3
Mar314, 01:19 PM

P: 36

True. But say I can't use trigonometry (Pythagoras is OK)  how do you show that the sides of congruent triangles are proportional? In my case below, it would be ideal to show that the rectangle with the sides DE and AB equals in area the rectangle with the sides BC and AD. For the theorem of Pythagoras, there is an elegant proof that the square c^2 equals the sum of the two squares a^2 and b^2. Similarly, for the Triangle Midsegment Theorem (see the link above). I don't see anything like that for the Proportional Segments Theorem, except an appeal to intuition.



#4
Mar314, 01:56 PM

P: 540

Proportional Segments Theorem



#5
Mar314, 02:46 PM

Mentor
P: 21,215

Regarding this question  "how do you show that the sides of congruent triangles are proportional" The corresponding sides of congruent triangles are equal in length, so technically they are proportional, with the proportion being 1. Perhaps you meant "sides of similar triangles" instead. 


#6
Mar314, 02:56 PM

P: 36

Yes, pardon me, I meant similar triangles, not congruent triangles. And no, I don't want to refer to the law of sines for a proof. My question is if I can show by a plain geometrical argument that makes sense to a 12year old (no trigonometry) that the sides of similar (!) triangles are proportional. There are such plain geometrical arguments for the Theorem of Pythagoras and for the Triangle Midsegment Theorem. I as yet can't think of one for the Proportional Segments Theorem without recourse to trigonometry.
Mentor's argument only shows me that the two triangles are similar, but not that their sides are proportional. Scott's argument uses trigonometry (the law of sines). By "OK" I mean it's OK to use P.'s theorem in your proof, but please no trig. 


#7
Mar314, 03:35 PM

Emeritus
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 6,334

Try this link: http://www.mathopenref.com/similartriangles.html If you google 'similar triangles', you can find other similar (no pun intended) links. 


#8
Mar314, 03:41 PM

P: 36

No, it's not homework. If it were, it appears that not only 12yearolds, but also some physicists on physicsforums.com would be stumped, including me :)
The website you are linking to (I found it earlier as well) does a great job appealing to our intuition, but the proof is still missing. Again, one thing that would satisfy me is if you could show me that the rectangle with the sides DE and AB equals in area the rectangle with the sides BC and AD. 


#9
Mar314, 05:07 PM

Mentor
P: 21,215

It's been a long, long time since I took geometry in 10th grade, but I believe there was a theorem that said that similar triangles have sides that are proportional in the same ratio. Being a geometry book, it would not have used trigonometry to reach this result. Off the top of my head I don't remember how it was done.



#10
Mar314, 05:16 PM

P: 36

I am beginning to think that this isn't so easy ...



#11
Mar314, 05:23 PM

P: 540

Here you go.
The meat starts at the bottom of page two, but read it from the start. If you're explaining it to a 12year old, strike the parts about nonEuclidean geometry. http://www.math.washington.edu/~lee/...upplement3.pdf 


#12
Mar314, 06:10 PM

P: 36

Brilliant. That's it. And not so easy ...



Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
About initial segments  Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics  1  
The Segments of a Polygon  Precalculus Mathematics Homework  6  
Segments of a polygon  General Math  21  
Segments,Proof help?  Calculus  3  
Ratios of Segments  Calculus & Beyond Homework  1 