- #1
- 4,652
- 38
I can't understand the difference between mental states as functional states vs. mental states as behavioral states. Can anyone explain?
Thanks,
MIH
Thanks,
MIH
Hello, MIH.Math Is Hard said:I can't understand the difference between mental states as functional states vs. mental states as behavioral states. Can anyone explain?
Thanks,
MIH
BoulderHead said:Functionalism, which you specifically asked about, likewise rejects the idea of an immaterial mind but differs in holding a given mind state is possible by multiplicity of physical states. Multiply realizable I believe is the catch phrase, iirc.
Don't quote me, but I believe the conventional view is that a functionalist can't be a dualist. I'd be interested in seeing what others think. I'm under the impression that functionalism is one of the most fundamental concepts which supports strong AI. Functionalism says the state the brain is in and the states it goes through are equal to the mind.Now with functionalism, my feeling is that it doesn't necessarily reject the idea of an immaterial mind since technically a dualist could be a functionalist.
Ref: http://www.nyu.edu/gsas/dept/philo/faculty/block/papers/functionalism.htmlWhat is Functionalism? Functionalism is one of the major proposals that have been offered as solutions to the mind/body problem. Solutions to the mind/body problem usually try to answer questions such as: What is the ultimate nature of the mental? At the most general level, what makes a mental state mental? Or more specifically, What do thoughts have in common in virtue of which they are thoughts? That is, what makes a thought a thought? What makes a pain a pain? Cartesian Dualism said the ultimate nature of the mental was to be found in a special mental substance. Behaviorism identified mental states with behavioral dispositions; physicalism in its most influential version identifies mental states with brain states. Functionalism says that mental states are constituted by their causal relations to one another and to sensory inputs and behavioral outputs.
Ref: http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~philos/MindDict/functionalism.htmlNed Block (1980) identifies three senses of functionalism. The first is simple decompositional functionalism. 'Functionalism' in this sense refers to a research strategy that relies on the decomposition of a system into its components; the whole system is then explained in terms of these functional parts. Second, computation-representation functionalism is a special case of decompositional functionalism which relies heavily on the 'computer-as-mind' analogy. Psychological explanation under computation-representation functionalism is "akin to providing a computer program for the mind" (Block 1980, p.171). Thus, mental processes are seen as being decomposable to a point where they can be thought of as processes which are as simple as those of a digital computer or, similarly, a Turing machine. Lastly, Block identifies metaphysical functionalism. This form of functionalism is a theory of mind that hypothesizes that mental states simply are functional states. The metaphysical functionalist claims that mental states are the types of mental state they are because of the causal relations between inputs, outputs and other mental (i.e. functional) states of the system, as in the Turing machine. The physical implementation of the set of functions which implement a mind are irrelevant to what makes something a mind – it's the functional relations that count.
Ref: http://classes.colgate.edu/pgregory/phil341/..\glossary.html#KPopular dualism: mind is an as yet undiscovered kind of spiritual substance, a sort of ghostly, spatially extended substance which can interact with physical substance
Maybe the first phrase to identify with functionalism is you don't need to look inside. "More precisely, functionalist theories take the identity of a mental state to be determined by its causal relations to sensory stimulations, other mental states, and behavior."* IOW, it doesn't matter what's going on inside of a mental state; You only need to consider a mental state as it relates to other things. So functionalists are interested in a mental state's extrinsic properties, not in its intrinsic properties.Q_Goest said:What I'm most interested in understanding is:
- what is functionalism (in simple terms) and
Functionalism focuses on the mental processes and functions of the mind, while behaviorism focuses on observable behaviors and their relationship to the environment.
Functionalism uses introspection and mental processes to understand the mind, while behaviorism relies on observable behaviors and their relationship to external stimuli.
In functionalism, consciousness is seen as a functional part of the mind that helps us adapt to our environment. In behaviorism, consciousness is not considered a valid topic of study as it cannot be observed.
Functionalism explains human behavior by understanding the purpose and function of our thoughts and actions. Behaviorism explains human behavior as a result of conditioning and reinforcement from the environment.
Functionalism has been criticized for being too subjective and lacking scientific evidence. Behaviorism has been criticized for oversimplifying human behavior and ignoring internal mental processes.