- #1
Russell E. Rierson
- 384
- 0
This is an interpretation of Christopher Langan's CTMU, www.ctmu.org , and Saint Anslem's ontological argument.
1.] If it is possible for a mind to perfectly understand[model] every aspect and detail of reality, then the mind that perfectly models reality is a super-intelligence, for all intents and purposes, the super-intelligence is God.
2.]If the perfect correspondence can be approached via a convergent analytic-synthetic propositional "limit", then the limit exists, even though a sentient mind within reality can only approach the limit.
3.] If the limit exists, the exact mental correspondence exists in the mind of a super-intelligence.
4.] That is to say, if the limit exists then a description exists.
5.] If the description exists then the "describer" exists, since the description is isomorphic.
6.]The describer is a super-intelligence.
7.] By definition, the super-intelligence is God.
The burden of proof becomes the burden of proving the "convergence", to an exact correspondence, between the mental construct[infinite number of axioms] and reality
At the limit
[MIND]<--->[REALITY]
M = R
[axiomatic method]--->[exact correspondence]<---[scientific method]
1.] If it is possible for a mind to perfectly understand[model] every aspect and detail of reality, then the mind that perfectly models reality is a super-intelligence, for all intents and purposes, the super-intelligence is God.
2.]If the perfect correspondence can be approached via a convergent analytic-synthetic propositional "limit", then the limit exists, even though a sentient mind within reality can only approach the limit.
3.] If the limit exists, the exact mental correspondence exists in the mind of a super-intelligence.
4.] That is to say, if the limit exists then a description exists.
5.] If the description exists then the "describer" exists, since the description is isomorphic.
6.]The describer is a super-intelligence.
7.] By definition, the super-intelligence is God.
The burden of proof becomes the burden of proving the "convergence", to an exact correspondence, between the mental construct[infinite number of axioms] and reality
At the limit
[MIND]<--->[REALITY]
M = R
[axiomatic method]--->[exact correspondence]<---[scientific method]