Railcar Operating Loads: Cargo Side Thrust Forces

In summary, the phrase "cargo side thrust forces" is not comprehensible to an English speaker and there may be a better way to say it.
  • #1
Altai
17
0
Dear native English-speaking professionals!
I am making up an info table concerning railcar operating loads, and I’m a bit stuck with one term - I’m not sure if it sounds comprehensible enough to an Enflish speaking reader.
Here is the part I’m struggling over:

"Load description: cargo side thrust forces (N/mm2)"
"σ = stresses due to bulk cargo side thrust static pressure per unit area of carbody side, MPa."

What I’d like to know - is the phrase “cargo side thrust forces” comprehensible enough? Does it sound right? Or is there probably a better way to put it? Being no native English speaker, I’m not really sure...
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
I would use the term "lateral loading" rather than side thrust forces. Also, the lateral loading may be expressed as either a total load (n's) or an average load or pressure (n/m^2), depending upon how it is being applied/used. Lateral loadings may apply to both the cargo, or the car (empty or loaded) depending on what is being considered; the forces on the rails or the cargo restraints. Lateral loadings may come from transient or short term lateral dynamic actions due to track roughness or misalignment, or the longer term loadings due to curves.

If you are talking about liquid or dry bulk cargo, they will exert a hydrostatic load on the walls of the container. That loading will vary with height, so either a maximum or an average pressure would be applicable. Of course dynamic loading would also add to the hydrostatic loading.

Cargo loads are applied in all 3 directions, but generally due to different influences, and they can be transient or longer term. Typically maximum loadings are due to transient effects.

With respect to stresses, I would be cautious in defining a general stress as you've indicated. There are many load and location combinations that can be critical such that defining a kind of average stress may be misleading.

The above comments are coming from a design perspective, not from an operating instruction point of view. My rail background has been with passenger vehicles rather than freight, but I don't think that changes the design aspects that much.
 
  • #3
Thank you very much for such a profound explanation! It really helps.
 

1. What are railcar operating loads?

Railcar operating loads refer to the forces and weights that are applied to a railcar while it is in motion. These loads can include cargo weight, wind resistance, and track irregularities.

2. What is cargo side thrust force?

Cargo side thrust force is the lateral force that is applied to a railcar due to the weight and movement of the cargo inside. This force can cause the railcar to sway or shift off the tracks if not properly accounted for.

3. How are cargo side thrust forces calculated?

Cargo side thrust forces are calculated by taking into account the weight of the cargo, the center of gravity, and the speed and direction of the train. The force is then calculated using Newton's Second Law of Motion, F=ma.

4. How do railcar operating loads affect the train's performance?

Railcar operating loads can significantly impact a train's performance. Excessive cargo weight or imbalanced cargo can cause the train to slow down, derail, or even damage the tracks. Therefore, it is crucial to carefully consider and manage these loads to ensure safe and efficient operation.

5. How can railcar operating loads be optimized?

To optimize railcar operating loads, careful planning and management are necessary. This includes properly distributing the cargo weight, securing the cargo to prevent shifting, and adhering to weight limits set by the railway. Additionally, advancements in technology and engineering have allowed for the development of specialized railcars that can better handle certain types of cargo and reduce the impact of operating loads.

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • General Engineering
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
1
Views
8K
Back
Top