- #1
sanman
- 745
- 24
Here are some articles discussing a recent design for a thermo-acoustic engine, which appears to be a variant on the Stirling Engine:
http://www.technologyreview.com/energy/32267/
http://theenergycollective.com/tyha...microchp-small-biogas-and-solar-thermal-power
So I'm wondering what the limitations are on this thermo-acoustic energy conversion process, and whether it could be suitable for nuclear power conversion applications.
The design seems to be more rugged and durable than traditional Stirling engines, which would be useful in a nuclear application.
But what are the limits on the volume of heat energy it can convert into electricity?
What is the figure of merit here?
I was thinking that this type of thermo-acoustic engine could be useful for nuclear-electric propulsion applications, whether on ocean-going ships or even submarines. The high-frequency acoustic waves would probably attenuate very quickly in the surrounding ocean, still leaving a submarine undetectable - especially in comparison to noisier steam-turbine operation.
But what about even for powering a VASIMR rocket? Could thermo-acoustic power conversion provide enough power output for a long enough duration on a round trip to Mars?
What would be the power-to-weight ratio for a thermo-acoustic engine?
http://www.technologyreview.com/energy/32267/
http://theenergycollective.com/tyha...microchp-small-biogas-and-solar-thermal-power
So I'm wondering what the limitations are on this thermo-acoustic energy conversion process, and whether it could be suitable for nuclear power conversion applications.
The design seems to be more rugged and durable than traditional Stirling engines, which would be useful in a nuclear application.
But what are the limits on the volume of heat energy it can convert into electricity?
What is the figure of merit here?
I was thinking that this type of thermo-acoustic engine could be useful for nuclear-electric propulsion applications, whether on ocean-going ships or even submarines. The high-frequency acoustic waves would probably attenuate very quickly in the surrounding ocean, still leaving a submarine undetectable - especially in comparison to noisier steam-turbine operation.
But what about even for powering a VASIMR rocket? Could thermo-acoustic power conversion provide enough power output for a long enough duration on a round trip to Mars?
What would be the power-to-weight ratio for a thermo-acoustic engine?