Proof that Determinant is Multiplicative for Commutative Rings

In summary, the conversation discusses the relationship between the determinant of two n x n matrices, A and B, over a commutative ring. It is mentioned that the determinant can be defined using alternating multilinear mappings and is also a homomorphism from the group of linear maps on a vector space V to its representation on the top exterior power. It is then shown that det(AB) = det(A)det(B) by using the composition of linear maps. The conversation also mentions that the determinant is multiplicative for elementary matrices and suggests writing B as a product of elementary matrices to rearrange the equation.
  • #1
Site
26
0
Is there a nice way to show that Det(AB)=Det(A)Det(B) where A and B are n x n matrices over a commutative ring?

I'm hoping there is some analogue to the construction for vector spaces that defines the determinant in a natural way using alternating multilinear mappings...

Otherwise would you just have to bash out the identity using the Leibniz formula for the determinant?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
##\det## is just a homomorphism from the group of linear maps on ##V## to its representation on the top exterior power ##\Lambda^n V##. Taking some ##v_i \in V##, we have ##\det A : \Lambda^n V \to \Lambda^n V## given by

[tex](\det A)(v_1 \wedge \ldots \wedge v_n) = A(v_1) \wedge \ldots \wedge A(v_n)[/tex]
From here it is easy to show ##\det AB = \det A \det B## by using the usual composition of linear maps on each factor in the wedge product on the right.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Thanks, Ben. To clarify, do you mean that we set ##V=R^n ## so that the group of linear maps on ##V## is the set of ##n##x##n## matrices?

Also, do you know of a textbook that explains exterior algebra (from the module perspective) and its connections to the determinant from the ground up?
 
  • #4
V can be any vector space at all.
 
  • #5
Site said:
Is there a nice way to show that Det(AB)=Det(A)Det(B) where A and B are n x n matrices over a commutative ring?

I'm hoping there is some analogue to the construction for vector spaces that defines the determinant in a natural way using alternating multilinear mappings...

Otherwise would you just have to bash out the identity using the Leibniz formula for the determinant?

Maybe you can first show (not too hard) , that the determinant is multiplicative for elementary matrices Ei . Then write B as a product of elementary matrices
and rearrange.
 

1. What is the proof that determinant is multiplicative for commutative rings?

The proof for this statement is based on the fact that determinant is a polynomial function of the entries of a matrix. For a commutative ring, the multiplication of two matrices can be seen as a polynomial multiplication, and therefore the determinant of the product matrix can be expressed as a product of the determinants of each individual matrix.

2. Why is commutativity important for this proof?

Commutativity is important because it allows us to rearrange the terms in a polynomial multiplication without changing the result. This property is crucial in the proof, as it allows us to manipulate the multiplication of matrices in a way that leads to the desired result.

3. Can this proof be extended to non-commutative rings?

No, this proof is specific to commutative rings. For non-commutative rings, the multiplication of matrices does not follow the same rules as polynomial multiplication, and therefore the proof does not hold.

4. What are the applications of this proof in mathematics?

This proof is used in various fields of mathematics, such as linear algebra, abstract algebra, and algebraic geometry. It is also important in applications involving matrices, such as in physics, engineering, and computer science.

5. Is this proof also valid for non-square matrices?

No, this proof is only valid for square matrices. The determinant of a non-square matrix is not well-defined, and therefore the proof cannot be extended to non-square matrices.

Similar threads

  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
923
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
2
Views
980
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
3
Views
10K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
16
Views
3K
Back
Top