- #71
studentx
- 7
- 0
Burnsys said:Burnsys... FAIR AND BALANCED! hahaha
Burnsys said:Burnsys... FAIR AND BALANCED! hahaha
russ_watters said:fourier jr, I don't know that I've seen such little relevance take so many words to say before.
Assume for the sake of argument both are true. That doesn't necessarily lead to your conclusion (Iraq did, afterall, invade their neighbor), but assume that is true as well. What does any of that have to do with terrorism? Answer: nothing.fourier jr said:1. the US manipulated the UN
2. the real reasons for the Iraq ataq #1 were Bush's popularity (or lack of...) and the impending military budget cuts.
was that a just war or what?
russ_watters said:fourier jr, I don't know that I've seen such little relevance take so many words to say before. But if you feel like making an argument to support the point, go for it.
Burnsys, I'm not denying that they exist, the conspiracy theory is in that they control the world. (of course, that would beg the question - if they did control the world, are they fighting each other for that control?)
Also, you haven't presented an argument yet...
russ_watters said:Can you tell me what progress, specifically, has been made toward a one-world government recently?
How about 1 word?: Rubbish. I won't be discussing this further. Its more absurdity than I can stomach at the moment and vastly off topic.Burnsys said:...and don't answer me with 1 line post...
Karl Popper claimed that science is essentially defined as a set of falsifiable theories; theories and claims which are not falsifiable are thus not science. Critics of conspiracy theories sometimes argue that many of them are not falsifiable and so cannot be scientific. This accusation is often accurate, and is a necessary consequence of the logical structure of certain kinds of conspiracy theories. These take the form of uncircumscribed existential statements, alleging the existence of some action or object without specifying the place or time at which it can be observed. Failure to observe the phenomenon can then always be the result of looking in the wrong place or looking at the wrong time — that is, having been duped by the conspiracy. This makes impossible any demonstration that the conspiracy does not exist.
russ_watters said:How about 1 word?: Rubbish. I won't be discussing this further. Its more absurdity than I can stomach at the moment and vastly off topic.
Burnsys said:Now i ask somenthing.,.. What do you think that people of the CFR is doinng? tell me what you think... what do they talk when they meet? if they are not planing global dominationt..