Proving SA > (5)^(0.5) for ABCD Tetrahedron w/ Inscribed Sphere

In summary: There is ABCD tetrahedron with inscribed sphere. S is a center of the sphere, radius of the sphere equates 1 and SA>=SB>=SC. Prove that SA>(5)^(0,5). In summary, the sphere is inscribed inside the ABCD tetrahedron. SA must be at least as long as the circumradius of a regular tetrahedron.
  • #1
klawesyn28
9
0
There is ABCD tetrahedron with inscribed sphere. S is a center of the
sphere, radius of the sphere equates 1 and SA>=SB>=SC. Prove that
SA>(5)^(0,5).


I can't solve it. Could anybody help me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
How can SA be larger than the radius of the sphere?
 
  • #3
The sphere is inscribed, it is inside the tetrahedron. I don't understand your question.
 
  • #4
It's obvious that SA must be at least as long as the circumradius of a regular tetrahedron. I looked around and I see it can be shown that a regular tetrahedron has a circumradius 3x as long as the inradius. That would make SA >= 3.

This stuff is new to me so I don't know how you were supposed to do it, but following the logic here is one way.

Wait, maybe it's not obvious. One doesn't know how long SD is. Oh well, it's beyond me.
 
  • #5
Why must SA be at least as long as the circumradius? Suppose the tetrahedron is really big compared to the sphere, and imagine the tetrahedron sitting upright. Place the sphere sitting at the center of the bottom face. Let A, B, C be the vertices of the bottom face. Then SA = SB = SC, which is approximately equal to distance from the center of the bottom face to A, which is much less than the circumradius, which is the distance from the center of the entire tetrahedron to A. Of course, in this case, since the sphere is so small in comparison, the desired result would still hold, but certainly not because SA is greater than the circumradius (since that's not true).
 
  • #6
I see, a shallow tetrahedron could have an arbitrarily large circumradius.
 
  • #7
If I read mathworld.com right, then there are many circumradii, but we can speak of "the" circumradius as the least one. It doesn't really make sense, then, to say that a tetrahedron has arbitrarily large circumradius. It has a fixed circumradius. Also, the shallowness of the tetrahedron is irrelevant. Keep in mind that a circumscribed sphere needs simply to be a subset of the tetrahedron, so it can be a tiny speck at the center of the tetrahedron, it doesn't have to be "maximal" and touch all four faces. So just imagine a regular tetrahedron the size of a Great Pyramid. Imagine you have a tiny round marble on the floor of your Great Tetrahedron, in the middle of the floor. Let 2H be the height of your Tetrahedron, and h be the radius of your tiny marble. Then the circumradius, R is (SA² - h² + H²)1/2, which is approximately (SA² + H²)1/2 which is certainly greater than SA. So in this case SA < R, not at least R as you claimed.
 
  • #8
klawesyn28 said:
The sphere is inscribed, it is inside the tetrahedron. I don't understand your question.

Sorry - I misread the question and had the tetrahedron inside the sphere.
 
  • #9
I have not proven this lemma (it'll be your contribution):
If pont D is a fixed distance from the ABC plane, SA is min when triangle ABC is equalateral and point D projects onto its center.
=======================
Projection of the inscribed sphere S onto the ABC plane is a circle
with center O.
Let triangle [tex]A_1 B_1 C_1[/tex] be circumscribed about circle O,
its sides respectively parallel to the sides of triangle [tex]ABC[/tex] .
The farther point D is from the [tex]ABC[/tex] plane,
the "closer" triangle [tex]ABC[/tex] is to triangle [tex]A_1 B_1 C_1[/tex] and the smaller SA is.
Triangle [tex]ABC[/tex] can get infinitely close to triangle [tex]A_1 B_1 C_1[/tex].
[tex]lim(ABC) = A_1 B_1 C_1 [/tex]
[tex]lim(SA) = SA_1[/tex] and [tex]SA > SA_1 [/tex]
Inradius of trianglle [tex]A_1 B_1 C_1[/tex] equates 1,
its circumradius [tex]OA_1 = 2[/tex].
From triangle [tex]S O A_1 :[/tex]
[tex]SA_1 = \sqrt (SO^2 + OA_1 ^2) =
\sqrt (1^2 + 2^2) = \sqrt 5 [/tex]
[tex]SA > \sqrt 5 [/tex].
Q.E.D.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
why its circumradius [tex]OA_1 = 2[/tex]?
 
  • #11
Triangle [tex]ABC[/tex] is equalateral according to the lemma, and so is triangle [tex]A_1 B_1 C_1 [/tex] by constructing.

P.S. This problem (and another one you posted on the Calculus forum) strikes me as an olympiad kind. Where did you get them?
Art of Problem Solving is probably a better place to get help. But you do need to show SOME work.
 

Related to Proving SA > (5)^(0.5) for ABCD Tetrahedron w/ Inscribed Sphere

1. What is SA and how is it related to the ABCD Tetrahedron with Inscribed Sphere?

SA stands for surface area and it is the total area of all the surfaces of the ABCD Tetrahedron with Inscribed Sphere. In this case, SA is referring to the surface area of the tetrahedron that is formed by connecting the four points of the inscribed sphere to the four vertices of the regular tetrahedron.

2. Why is it important to prove that SA > (5)^(0.5) for the ABCD Tetrahedron with Inscribed Sphere?

Proving that SA > (5)^(0.5) for the ABCD Tetrahedron with Inscribed Sphere is important because it shows that the surface area of this particular shape is greater than the square root of 5. This has implications in various fields such as geometry, engineering, and physics, where surface area is an important factor in calculations and measurements.

3. How can you prove that SA > (5)^(0.5) for the ABCD Tetrahedron with Inscribed Sphere?

The proof involves using geometric principles and formulas to calculate the surface area of the ABCD Tetrahedron with Inscribed Sphere. This includes finding the area of each face of the tetrahedron and using the Pythagorean theorem to find the length of each edge. Then, the surface area can be calculated using the formula SA = 1/2 * base * height for each triangular face. By comparing this calculated surface area to (5)^(0.5), it can be shown that SA > (5)^(0.5).

4. Are there any assumptions or limitations in this proof?

Yes, there are some assumptions and limitations in this proof. One assumption is that the ABCD Tetrahedron with Inscribed Sphere is a regular tetrahedron, meaning that all four of its faces are equilateral triangles. Additionally, this proof only applies to tetrahedrons with inscribed spheres, and not other shapes or sizes of tetrahedrons.

5. What are the real-world applications of this proof?

This proof has various real-world applications in fields such as construction, architecture, and engineering. Knowing the surface area of a shape is important in determining material quantities and costs, as well as structural stability and design. This proof can also be used in theoretical mathematics and geometry to understand the properties of shapes and their relationships.

Similar threads

  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
480
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
1
Views
866
Back
Top