Potential Energy Based On Order Of Force Applications?

In summary, the conversation discusses the effect of the order in which forces are administered on an object's total energy. The examples given involve an elevator being pulled up and down by an elevator cable with different force orders, and the potential energy gained or lost in each scenario. The conclusion is that the order of forces does matter when it comes to potential energy, as demonstrated by the two scenarios with identical force applications but different orders resulting in different total energy for each case. The potential energy in this situation has no meaningful value due to the uniform gravitational field.
  • #1
DocZaius
365
11
An elevator cable pulls an elevator up with a force of (g+a)*m for t seconds where m is the mass of the elevator, accelerating it upwards. Then, for t seconds (just as many as the first time interval), it applies an upward force of (g-a)*m, decelerating it to a stop (the net force here is downwards because of g-a).

Let's put the potential energy reference point at the beginning of the situation. The elevator moved up. The elevator thus gained potential energy.

Now consider that the order had been reversed. First (g-a)*m then (g+a)*m, each for the same time intervals. The total force applied to the elevator would have been the same, yet the elevator would have lost potential energy in the latter case.

Is that correct? Did I do something wrong? It seems odd to me that two situations with identical force applications but differing orders of those applications would result in differing total energy for each case.

Note: this is not a homework question.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Maybe I should rephrase my scenarios:

Consider an elevator at height h. If that elevator's cable first applies a force of (g+a)*m for y meters, then applies a force of (g-a)*m for y meters, the elevator's height is h+2y meters.

Now consider that same elevator back at height h. This time though, the elevator is first applying a force of (g-a) * m for -y meters, then applying a force of (g+a)*m for -y meters, the elevator's height is h-2y

In the first case, the elevator accelerated up, then accelerated down, and gained height (at the time it accelerated down, it had a positive velocity and so the acceleration down stopped it)
In the second case, the elevator accelerated down, then accelerated up, and lost height. (at the time it accelerated up, it had a negative velocity and so the acceleration up stopped it)

First case elevator's final PE > Second case elevator's final PE

The only difference between the first case and the second case was the order in which the forces of the elevator cable were administered.

Force order therefore matters when it comes to potential energy. Do you agree with this, and if not, where did I go wrong?

Again, not a homework question. I created this problem to show that order in which forces are administered has an effect on an object's total energy.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Of course the order which you apply the forces on the body determines the direction in which the body moves, but you must agree that you case is equivalent to the case with no gravitational field, when the force is ±ma.
The potential energy here has no meaning, since the field is uniform, by definition it is infinite, so the fact that you choose some surface in that infinite uniform field, and say all objects must stop there, has no physical or mathematical meaning (the distance from this chosen surface).
 

1. What is potential energy based on order of force applications?

Potential energy based on order of force applications is a concept in physics that refers to the energy stored in an object due to its position or configuration. It is a form of stored energy that can be converted into kinetic energy to do work.

2. How is potential energy based on order of force applications different from other types of potential energy?

Potential energy based on order of force applications is different from other types of potential energy, such as gravitational or elastic potential energy, because it is dependent on the order in which forces are applied to an object. In this type of potential energy, the order of force application affects the amount of energy stored in the object.

3. What are some examples of potential energy based on order of force applications?

Some examples of potential energy based on order of force applications include a compressed spring, a stretched rubber band, and an object held at a certain height above the ground. In each of these cases, the potential energy is stored due to the forces applied to the object in a specific order.

4. How is potential energy based on order of force applications calculated?

The calculation of potential energy based on order of force applications involves determining the work done by each force applied to an object in a specific order. The total potential energy can then be calculated by adding up the individual potential energies from each force applied.

5. How does potential energy based on order of force applications relate to the conservation of energy?

Potential energy based on order of force applications is related to the conservation of energy in that it represents the potential for energy to be converted into kinetic energy and do work. According to the law of conservation of energy, energy cannot be created or destroyed, but can only be converted from one form to another.

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
950
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
737
Replies
6
Views
664
Replies
2
Views
789
Replies
5
Views
881
Replies
76
Views
4K
Back
Top