| Thread Closed |
electrostatics |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Mar8-06, 05:01 AM | #1 |
|
|
electrostatics
We have a charge distribution in which all the charges are in equilibrium due to electrostatic forces . Can we prove that none of these charges will be in stable equilibrium ?
|
| Mar8-06, 06:18 AM | #2 |
|
Recognitions:
|
Yes, since the potential due to the other charges satisfies [itex]\nabla^2 V=0[/itex]. V is harmonic with has the property that is has no local maxima or minima.
|
| Mar8-06, 10:27 AM | #3 |
|
Recognitions:
|
It is called Thomson's theorem.
|
| Mar8-06, 10:56 AM | #4 |
|
Recognitions:
|
electrostatics
Do you mean Earnshaw's theorem?
|
| Mar8-06, 11:51 AM | #5 |
|
Recognitions:
|
Whoops, Galileo is right again. I meant Earnshaw.
Thomson had several theorems (besides his home run), but not that one. Sorry, and thank you. |
| Mar8-06, 09:48 PM | #6 |
|
|
Yes, since the potential due to the other charges satisfies [itex]\nabla^2 V=0[/itex]is being generated. Reload this page in a moment.. V is harmonic with has the property that is has no local maxima or minima.
thats what i wanted to ask . how can we prove that [itex]\nabla^2 V=0[/itex] |
| Mar9-06, 05:04 AM | #7 |
|
Recognitions:
|
It's just Maxwell's (first) equation: [itex]\vec \nabla \cdot \vec E =\rho/\epsilon_0[/itex], or [itex]\nabla^2 V=-\rho/\epsilon_0[/itex].
In the region where there is no charge density you have [itex]\nabla^2 V=0[/itex]. |
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: electrostatics
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| electrostatics physics help | Classical Physics | 8 | ||
| Electrostatics | Introductory Physics Homework | 5 | ||
| electrostatics | Advanced Physics Homework | 3 | ||
| electrostatics | Classical Physics | 4 | ||
| electrostatics | Introductory Physics Homework | 2 | ||