What would a PV curve for a Quasiturbine engine look like?

  • Thread starter Thread starter taijin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curve Engine
AI Thread Summary
A discussion on the PV curve for a Quasiturbine engine highlights the challenge of visualizing its performance characteristics. Participants suggest exploring related resources, including articles and diagrams on Otto cycles, as a basis for understanding the Quasiturbine's PV curve. One user emphasizes the importance of considering temperature and entropy diagrams alongside the PV curve. The consensus is to adapt existing Otto cycle diagrams to better represent the Quasiturbine engine's unique features. Overall, leveraging existing resources and modifying them appears to be the recommended approach for the report.
taijin
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Im working on a report for my physics class on engines and I wanted to do a report on the quasiturbine engine but I can't figure out what a PV curve for a Quasiturbine engine would look like?
http://quasiturbine.promci.qc.ca/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm not familiar with this engine, but just a thought: sometimes it's helpful to look at the temperature/entropy diagram as well.
 
disregard my last reply. I was just reading about this engine, and you probably want the P/V diagram, check out factbug.org

It says this engine operates around an otto cycle. I'm certain you can google a graphic of an otto cycle pv diagram. Then, perhaps modify it for your purposes?
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Efficiency of Stirling Cycle - Is it the same as the Carnot Engine?
Replies
14
Views
1K
Other Which branch of engineering is more physics heavy?
2
Replies
63
Views
541
Calculating work done by a Carnot engine
Replies
14
Views
9K
How Does Process B Work If PV Is Constant and Internal Energy Changes?
Replies
3
Views
4K
Can a thermodynamic heat engine include all these processes?
Replies
2
Views
1K
What Forces Act on a Train Engine Going Around a Circular Curve?
Replies
10
Views
3K
I Finding the equation of a curved line
Replies
16
Views
3K
Kinematics: Two engines, One Rocket, and Displacement.
Replies
11
Views
2K
B Question about units for "area under curve"
Replies
2
Views
3K
Calculating the work done in a PV diagram
Replies
5
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top