Time needed for a lake to freeze over.

  • Thread starter Thread starter adrian116
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lake Time
adrian116
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
a). Show that the thickness of the ice sheet formed on the surface of a lake is proportional to the square root of the time if the heat of fusion of the water freezing on the underside of the ice sheet is conducted through the sheet.
b). Assuming that the upper surface of the ice sheet is at -10 degree celsius and that the bottom surface is at 0 degree celcius, calculate the time it will take to form an ice sheet 25 cm thick.
c). If the lake in part (b) is uniformly 40m deep, how long would it take to freeze all the water in the lake?

I have the difficulty on part a that how to work out the relationship.

thx for attention
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Show us your work.

Can you perform an energy balance for part (a)? What is the physical process involved in ice formation here? What are the assumptions you have to make?

Hint: If you do part (a) you can do the others as well. :approve:
 
I have applied the forumla (dQ/dt)=kA(T2 - T1)/l,

(T2-higher temperture,T1-lower temperture
k- thermal conductivity, A- area , l-length)

then move dt to the right hand side, take the integral,

I would get the formula like this Q=tkA(T2 - T1)/l,

then applied the latent heat formula that Q=mL (L is latent heat),

such that mL=tkA(T2 - T1)/l , then

p(l^3) L =tkA(T2-T1)/l, (p-density)

i have stopped here...was my assumption of Q wrong?
shouldn't i apply the latent heat forumla?
 
adrian116 said:
I have applied the forumla (dQ/dt)=kA(T2 - T1)/l,

(T2-higher temperture,T1-lower temperture
k- thermal conductivity, A- area , l-length)

So far its correct. You're on the right track.

then move dt to the right hand side, take the integral,

I would get the formula like this Q=tkA(T2 - T1)/l,

No, this isn't correct. You have assumed that the length (l) of the developing ice layer is independent of time and so Q is linearly varying with time t. You have to use the general form of Fourier's heat conduction equation here:

\frac{dQ}{dt} = -kA\frac{dT}{dy}

Assume that the atmosphere (the air) above the water surface is at a temperature -T degrees (so T > 0). If water is to freeze, it must loose "latent heat" to the surroundings and come to a temperature of 0 degrees.

Consider a differential layer of freshly formed ice at a depth y from the water surface. This layer is of width dy and is at 0 degrees. At this stage, you will have to assume that heat conduction is taking place at steady state and hence dQ/dt is the same everywhere in the medium. The heat conduction equation gives

\frac{dQ}{dt} = kA\frac{(0-(-T)}{y} = kA\frac{T}{y}

Now we cannot integrate at this stage to get Q because we do not know y as a function of time t (which is what we want to find out). The trick here is to observe that dQ is also the "latent heat lost" by the differential layer which enables it to freeze without change in temperature (from 0 degrees).

Hence dQ = dmL. Also observe that the mass of the differential layer is dm = \rho A dy where \rho as the density of water. It is also the density of ice. This is an unrealistic assumption here: density of water = density of ice. Hence,

\frac{dQ}{dt} = \rho A \frac{dy}{dt}

Now you can equate the two expressions for dQ/dt to get your expression.

The assumptions made are:

1. Conduction of heat to the atmosphere from any differential layer takes place in steady state.
2. Density of ice is equal to density of water (as we are assuming that A and dy are both constant as the ice forms out of an equal mass of water).

EDIT: Armed with y as a function of time t, you can also find dQ/dt = \rho A dy/dt just to see how it varies with time.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes phoenix95
I have got the answer , thanks so much
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top