Thread Closed

easy to understand, hard to solve

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Jan8-04, 03:56 PM   #1
 

easy to understand, hard to solve


hi
that is my first time, and i have questions for my exam.

* Show that if a function "f" is continuous and has no zeros on an interval, then either f(x)>0 or f(x)<0 for every "x" in the interval
(Intermediate Value Theorem)

I solved it in that way:
since no zeros in the interval then the interval will be
(-inf,0)U(0,inf)
so f(x) will not be 0.... but that can be possible, and didn't know how to do it???

please i need the answer in maximum 2 days [:(]
any efforts will be appreciated
thank you
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> Ants and carnivorous plants conspire for mutualistic feeding
>> Forecast for Titan: Wild weather could be ahead
>> Researchers stitch defects into the world's thinnest semiconductor
Jan8-04, 04:33 PM   #2
 
Recognitions:
Science Advisor Science Advisor
I always had trouble with these. I always would just think, "that's true by definition. How can I prove it?"

First, assume that it is not true. Then, for some value of x on the interval, f(x) and f(x+dx) will have opposite signs, so that:

f(x)f(x+dx)<0 (positive * negative is always <0)

using the basic definition of a derivitive, f'(x)=[f(x+dx)-f(x)]/dx you can solve for f(x+dx)=dx*f'(x)+f(x)

substituting, you get:

f(x)*[dx*f'(x)+f(x)]<0

Take the limit as dx->0 and:

f(x)*f(x)<0

The left side of the equation is a square, it can not be <0

So assuming the thing you are trying to prove is false yields an impossibility.


I think this is good.
Njorl

PS- I know I used sloppy notation, dx instead of delta x. I forgot how to make deltas.
Jan8-04, 07:09 PM   #3
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Nice approach, but just because the function is continuous, doesn't mean that it's differentiable.

Lets say we have f(x) > 0 and f(y) < 0 with x,y on the interval.
let a = min (x,y) and b=max(x,y)
Clearly (a,b) is contained in the interval. Therefore f is continuous on [a,b].
It's also clear that 0 is between f(a) and f(a)

Then by applying the intermediate value theorem we get hat there must be some point x on the interval [a,b] such that f(x)=0, but this contradicts the hypothesis that [tex]f(x) \neq 0[/tex] on the interval.
Jan9-04, 05:44 AM   #4
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus

easy to understand, hard to solve


How you would do this depends upon what prior theorems you have to work with. Have you had the "intermediate value theorem"? That says that if f(x) is continuous on [a,b] then, on [a,b], f takes on all values between f(a) and f(b).
Thread Closed
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: easy to understand, hard to solve
Thread Forum Replies
how to solve every physics problem ever and understand the universe General Discussion 21
Gauss's (hard to understand) Law Introductory Physics Homework 7
Chemistry is so hard to understand when you're bored and tired... Chemistry 3
sure this is easy for you but I dont understand... Special & General Relativity 2