Motorcycle: Lean Angle, Speed, and Turn Radius

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between lean angle, speed, and turn radius for motorcycles negotiating curves. The lean angle θ is initially approximated by the formula tan(θ) = v²/(rg), where g is gravity and r is the curve radius. However, the conversation highlights the need to refine this relationship for motorcycles with wider tires, which can affect stability and handling. The impact of tire width is considered, with the assumption that the contact area is semicircular and the tire widths are uniform. Ultimately, the refined equation accounts for the height of the mass center and the geometry of the motorcycle during a lean.
Julian Solos
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Suppose you are riding a motorcycle at a constant speed v[/color] and about to enter a level, circular, curve of radius r[/color]. You intend to lean with the bike and want to make negotiating the curve as smooth and effortless as possible.

Then the lean angle (from the vertical) of the motorcycle \theta to which the motorcycle will settle into is approximated by the following relationship

tan (\theta) = \frac {v^2} {rg}

where g[/color] is the acceleration due to gravity.

If the widths of the tires of the motorcycle are narrow, like those of bicycle tires, the above relationship should give a good approximation. However, many of today's motorcycles have wide tires, i.e. 19 cm. Can we refine the above relationship with the addition of a variable or variables related to the widths of the tires of the motorcycle?

(For simplicity's sake, shall we assume the widths of the front and rear tires are the same so hat we need to use only one width and the sections of the tires which make contact with the ground are semicircles of the radius equal to the tire width and their shape remains the same throughout the range of possible lean angles?)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Julian Solos said:
Suppose you are riding a motorcycle at a constant speed v and about to enter a level, circular, curve of radius r. You intend to lean with the bike and want to make negotiating the curve as smooth and effortless as possible.

Then the lean angle (from the vertical) of the motorcycle \theta to which the motorcycle will settle into is approximated by the following relationship

tan (\theta) = \frac {v^2} {rg}

where g is the acceleration due to gravity.

If the widths of the tires of the motorcycle are narrow, like those of bicycle tires, the above relationship should give a good approximation. However, many of today's motorcycles have wide tires, i.e. 19 cm. Can we refine the above relationship with the addition of a variable or variables related to the widths of the tires of the motorcycle?

(For simplicity's sake, shall we assume the widths of the front and rear tires are the same so hat we need to use only one width and the sections of the tires which make contact with the ground are semicircles of the radius equal to the tire width and their shape remains the same throughout the range of possible lean angles?)
Just need to consider the point of contact with the ground and the position of the nass centre of bike+rider. If the height of the mass centre is h when upright and the tyre radius is r then when the bike leans at angle θ the height is ##r+(h-r)\cos(\theta)## and the horizontal displacement of mass centre from point of contact is ##(h-r)\sin(\theta)##.
Going around a curve radius R at speed v we have ##\frac{v^2}{Rg}=\frac{(h-r)\sin(\theta)}{r+(h-r)\cos(\theta)}##.
Note that setting r=0 gives the simpler equation.
 
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

Replies
86
Views
15K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
9K
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
21K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K