Simple proof, just using the axioms

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ed Quanta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Axioms Proof
Ed Quanta
Messages
296
Reaction score
0
How could I show that (-m)(-n)= mn? The only thing I am allowed to use to prove this are the 5 basic mathematical axioms which allow for the commutative property and associative propery of the binary operations multiplication and addition;there exists an additive inverse for each integer, 1 is the multiplicative identity, and 0 is the additive identity, while mn=mp implies p=n where m is not equal to 0.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
presumably you know that 0.0=0

so that 0=0.0=(1-1)(1-1)=1-1.1+1.(-1)+(-1)(-1),

=>

1=(-1)(-1)

the general case now follows easily from the fact -n = (-1).n

you could do it more directly 0=m-m=n-n but you'd still have to use -n=(-1).n at some point.
 
Thanks my man
 
The world of 2\times 2 complex matrices is very colorful. They form a Banach-algebra, they act on spinors, they contain the quaternions, SU(2), su(2), SL(2,\mathbb C), sl(2,\mathbb C). Furthermore, with the determinant as Euclidean or pseudo-Euclidean norm, isu(2) is a 3-dimensional Euclidean space, \mathbb RI\oplus isu(2) is a Minkowski space with signature (1,3), i\mathbb RI\oplus su(2) is a Minkowski space with signature (3,1), SU(2) is the double cover of SO(3), sl(2,\mathbb C) is the...