Calculating Time It Takes for Ball to be Overtaken

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cole07
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Falling
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the time it takes for a second ball bearing, released from 4.5m below point A, to be overtaken by a first ball bearing dropped from rest at point A and passing the 3.5m mark. The first ball's velocity at 3.5m is calculated to be 8.282 m/s, which is crucial for determining the equations of motion for both balls. By setting their positions equal and solving for time, it is found that the second ball is overtaken after approximately 0.12 seconds. The distance the second ball falls during this time is calculated to be about 0.070m. The discussion emphasizes the importance of clearly defining variables and equations for clarity in problem-solving.
Cole07
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
A ball bearing is dropped from rest at point A. At the instant it passes mark 3.5m below A, another ball bearing is realeased from rest from a position of 4.5m below A. At what time after its release will the second ball bearing be overtaken by the first?

How far does the second ball bearing fall in that time?


I know i have 2 distances and it starts at rest so it doesn't have an intial velocity i also know all falling objects have an acceleration of -9.8 so i used the formula d=1/2a(t)^2 and i used 3.5 for d -9.8 for a and t is my unknown so what am i doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
first thing you want to do is find the velocity of the first ball as it hits the 3.5m mark. To do that...

Vf^2 = Vi^2 + 2a(Xf-Xi) [Vf = final velocity; Vi = Initial velocity; (xf-xi) = displacement]
Vf^2 = 0 + 2(9.8 m/s^2)(3.5m - 0) will use the initial position as A
Vf = 8.282 m/s

So we know that the first ball is traveling at 8.282 m/s as soon as the 2nd ball is being dropped. Now consider your distance formulas.

Xf = Xi + ViT + 1/2aT^2

Xf = 3.5m + (8.282 m/s)T + 1/2(9.8 m/s^2)(T^2) - equation for first ball
Xf = 4.5m + (0) + 1/2(9.8 m/s^2)T^2 - equation for second ball

Now we have two equations and two unknowns (time and position). The time and position in both equations are the same, so a simple subtraction will give us the answer.

Xf = 3.5m + (8.282 m/s)T + 1/2(9.8 m/s^2)(T^2)
Xf = 4.5m + (0) + 1/2(9.8 m/s^2)T^2
---------------------------------------------------
0 = (-1m) + (8.282 m/s)T + 0
T = 1/8.182 m/s
T = .12 seconds

Now that you have the time you can figure out how far the second ball falls.

D = 1/2at^2 (this is only true when the ball is dropped from rest)
D = 1/2(9.8 m/s^2)(.12)^2
D = .070m
 
ok i get everything but what xf stands for and thanks for the help!
 
Xf = final position. Both balls will have the same final position so you can set their equations equal to each other (or subtract them)

The equation you use D = 1/2at^2 is similar

Xf = Xi + ViT + 1/2at^2 in my equation when you set the initial position to 0 and the initial velocity to zero you get...

Xf = 1/2at^2 which is the same thing as your equation.

Next time try to include all equations you believe have relevance to the problem so that I don't have to use my own notation which can be confusing.
 
Thank you for the help i got it !
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top