Learn How to Evaluate Triple Integrals: Volume vs Surface Integral Method

  • Thread starter Thread starter jlmac2001
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on evaluating the triple integral of the vector field F = (x^2+y^2+z^2)(xi+yj+zk) over the spherical region defined by x^2+y^2+z^2 ≤ 25. The preferred method for this evaluation is the volume integral method due to the symmetry of the sphere, which simplifies calculations. The divergence theorem is also highlighted as a useful approach, allowing the conversion of the volume integral into a surface integral. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding both methods to determine the most efficient approach for specific problems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of triple integrals and their setup
  • Familiarity with spherical and cylindrical coordinates
  • Knowledge of the divergence theorem
  • Basic calculus concepts, including vector fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the divergence theorem in detail
  • Learn how to convert between Cartesian, cylindrical, and spherical coordinates
  • Practice evaluating triple integrals using both volume and surface integral methods
  • Explore applications of vector fields in physics and engineering
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are looking to enhance their skills in evaluating triple integrals and understanding vector calculus concepts.

jlmac2001
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
Evaluate the triple integral (grad dot F dV) over the region x^2+y^2+z^2 less than or equal to 25 if F+(x^2+y^2+z^2)(xi+yj+zk), by doing either a volume or a surface integral, whichever is easiest!


will each of the integral go from -5 to 5? what is the easiest way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have a problem:

If you are attempting a problem like this, you should already have learned how to set up a general triple integral!

No, the three integrals do not all go from -5 to 5. That would be a rectangular solid. Your figure here is a sphere. If you wanted to integrate over the volume of the sphere, in cartesian coordinates, you would have, say, x form -5 to 5, y from -√(25-x2) to +√(25-x2), z from -√(25-x2-y2) to +√(25-x2-y2).
You could also use spherical coordinates in which you would have ρ from 0 to 5, θ from 0 to 2π, φ from 0 to π or cylindrical coordinates: r from 0 to 5, θ from 0 to 2π, z from -√(25- r2) to √(25- r2).

In this case, with F= (x^2+y^2+z^2)(xi+yj+zk), &del;.F (That is, by the way "del dot F", not "grad dot F": "grad" is specifically del of a scalar function), also called "div F" or the "divergence of F" is complicated. I would be inclined to use the divergence theorem: [tex]\int\int_T\int(\del . v)dV= \int_S (v.n)dS[/tex] where T is a three dimensional solid, S is the surface of the solid, and n is the unit normal vector to the surface at each point.

Since the surface of the figure is given by x2+ y2+z2= 25, The (not-unit) normal vector is given by the gradient of the left hand side: 2xi+ 2yj+ 2zk. If we choose to do the integration in the xy-plane, we divide by the k coefficient:
n dσ= ((x/z)i+ (y/z)j+ k)dydx. and integrate on the circle x2+y2= 25.

I would be inclined to use polar coordinates to do that since, then, z= √(25- r2) and F= 25(rcosθi+rsinθj+ &radic(25- r2)k)
(In order to get the entire surface of the sphere you would need to do z>0 and z< 0 separately. Alternatively, because of the symmetry, just multiply by 2.)
 


The integral will indeed go from -5 to 5 for all three variables, since the region x^2+y^2+z^2 less than or equal to 25 is a sphere with radius 5 centered at the origin.

To evaluate this triple integral, we can use either the volume or surface integral method. The volume integral method involves splitting the region into small infinitesimal cubes and calculating the contribution of each cube to the overall integral, while the surface integral method involves evaluating the integral over the surface of the region.

In this case, since the function F is in terms of x^2+y^2+z^2, it would be easier to use the volume integral method. This is because the region is a sphere, so splitting it into small cubes would result in each cube having the same contribution to the integral. We can then use the formula for the volume of a sphere to calculate the contribution of each cube, and then integrate over all the cubes to get the final answer.

On the other hand, if the function F was not in terms of x^2+y^2+z^2, it might be easier to use the surface integral method. This is because the surface integral method allows us to directly integrate over the surface of the region, which might be more straightforward than calculating the contribution of each cube.

In general, the choice between volume and surface integral method depends on the specific function and region involved. It is important to understand both methods and choose the one that is easier for a given problem.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K