relationship between work and potential energy


by lzh
Tags: energy, potential, relationship, work
lzh
lzh is offline
#1
Jan20-07, 07:23 PM
P: 111
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
At time ti, the kinetic energy of a particle is
35.5 J and its potential energy is 8.16 J.At
some later time tf , its kinetic energy is 9.38 J.
If only conservative forces act on the parti-
cle, what is its potential energy tf ? Answer
in units of J.
If the potential energy at time tf is 6.95 J,
what is the work done by the nonconservative
forces acting on the particle? Answer in units
of J.


2. Relevant equations
W=F*displacement*cos(theta)


3. The attempt at a solution
For the first part of the question, because there were only conservative forces, the sum of kinetic and potential must be same for both ti and tf. And i know that i have the right answer for that. But for the second part, where force isn't conserved, that would not be the case:
I CANNOT take the sum of 35.5 and 8.16 and subtract 6.95 like i did for the first part.
I dont think i completely understand the concept here, so i'd appreciate any help.
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Lemurs match scent of a friend to sound of her voice
Repeated self-healing now possible in composite materials
'Heartbleed' fix may slow Web performance
Decan
Decan is offline
#2
Jan20-07, 07:41 PM
P: 44
You're missing a relationship between work and energy. W = ______

Fill in the blank and you should have your answer. Hint (you're not looking for W = Fd)
lzh
lzh is offline
#3
Jan20-07, 07:45 PM
P: 111
work is kinetic energy here, right?

Decan
Decan is offline
#4
Jan20-07, 09:37 PM
P: 44

relationship between work and potential energy


and what else...
PhanthomJay
PhanthomJay is online now
#5
Jan20-07, 09:38 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
PhanthomJay's Avatar
P: 5,961
Quote Quote by lzh View Post
work is kinetic energy here, right?
No. When non-conservative forces act, total mechanical energy is not conserved. How much energy did you start with? What did you end up with? Can you explain this?
lzh
lzh is offline
#6
Jan20-07, 09:54 PM
P: 111
well, I started with 43.66J. But i dont know how much ends up being left.
lzh
lzh is offline
#7
Jan20-07, 10:03 PM
P: 111
wait... can this possibly be right?:
W=KE+PE
Decan
Decan is offline
#8
Jan20-07, 10:11 PM
P: 44
That's my line of thought...work done by non conservative forces= change in kinetic energy + change in potential energy
lzh
lzh is offline
#9
Jan20-07, 10:42 PM
P: 111
so does the answer to this part end up the same as first part of the question?
PhanthomJay
PhanthomJay is online now
#10
Jan20-07, 11:42 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
PhanthomJay's Avatar
P: 5,961
Quote Quote by lzh View Post
so does the answer to this part end up the same as first part of the question?
No. The initial mechanical energy,
(KE + PE)_initial, is 43.66J. The final mechanical energy, (KE + PE)_final, is 16.33J. The difference between the two represents the change in the total mechanical energy of the system , which is, as stated above, equal to the work done by the non-conservative forces.
lzh
lzh is offline
#11
Jan21-07, 09:59 AM
P: 111
would the change in mechanical energy be negative?
-27.33J in this case.
because +27.33J is wrong, according to my hw service
Decan
Decan is offline
#12
Jan21-07, 02:03 PM
P: 44
Assuming you did the calculation right, the work should be negative.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Is Potential Energy Work? Introductory Physics Homework 2
Work and Potential Energy! Please Help Introductory Physics Homework 8
Work and Potential Energy Introductory Physics Homework 8
Work and Potential Energy Introductory Physics Homework 5
Potential Energy and Work Introductory Physics Homework 1