How can I produce a net translational force on a ferromagnet?

AI Thread Summary
To produce a net translational force on a ferromagnet, introducing an external magnetic field is essential. A constant magnetic field typically generates torque rather than translational motion. However, non-uniform magnetic fields can create a translational effect as one pole of the magnet moves closer to the stronger part of the field, resulting in movement. An example of this phenomenon is observed in certain aquatic bacteria that possess permanent ferromagnets aligned with the Earth's magnetic field. These bacteria utilize their magnetic orientation to navigate and burrow into sediment, avoiding toxic oxygen-rich water. This highlights the intricate relationship between magnetic fields and motion in ferromagnetic materials.
endersdouble
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
How can I produce a net translational force on a ferromagnet?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think that's analogous to asking how you balance an egg on the tip of a pen.
 


Originally posted by endersdouble
How can I produce a net translational force on a ferromagnet?

Introduce an external magnetic field.
 
Any external field? I had some idea that a constant field would only torque the magnet, not put a translational on it...but not sure how to mathematically determine forces from field B on a ferromagnet M.
 


Originally posted by endersdouble
How can I produce a net translational force on a ferromagnet?

Uhh; push it with your finger!


... I had some idea that a constant field would only torque the magnet, not put a translational on it...but not sure how to mathematically determine forces from field B on a ferromagnet M.

Oh, you mean produce translational motion using an external field? :wink:

You are correct; generally a uniform magnetic field only produces a torque. However, most external fields are not uniform over much of a distance; so when the poles of the magnet rotate usually one pole is 'closer' to the stronger external pole and the entire magnet translates in that direction.

However, in a large B field like the earth, small magnets have no translational motion.

There is a species of aquatic bacteria that has been found to have a built-in string of 'permanent' ferromagnets inside it (about 1 micron in diameter) pointing with the North pole facing toward its 'head'.
The Earth's field doesn't 'pull' it either way, but simply rotates it to align with the Earth's North field. The bacteria has flaggella in its 'rear' that propells it forward as it points toward the Earth's North pole, which by the way, is on an angle into the earth. So the bacteria always burrows into the slim beneath the waters, keeping it away from the upper oxygen rich water that is toxic to them. Quite an interesting internal guidance system.


Creator
 
Last edited:


Originally posted by Creator

There is a species of aquatic bacteria that has been found to have a built-in string of 'permanent' ferromagnets inside it (about 1 micron in diameter) pointing with the North pole facing toward its 'head'.
The Earth's field doesn't 'pull' it either way, but simply rotates it to align with the Earth's North field. The bacteria has flaggella in its 'rear' that propells it forward as it points toward the Earth's North pole, which by the way, is on an angle into the earth. So the bacteria always burrows into the slim beneath the waters, keeping it away from the upper oxygen rich water that is toxic to them. Quite an interesting internal guidance system.

Creator
[/B]

The things you can learn on this site!
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top