How do I estimate complex eigenvalues?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on estimating complex eigenvalues of a real matrix A, highlighting the limitations of the QR algorithm for this purpose. The user, photis, recommends using the LAPACK routine dgeev.f, which effectively handles complex eigenvalues without requiring complex arithmetic, as they appear in conjugate pairs. The discussion also mentions the necessity of reducing the matrix to Hessenberg form and suggests exploring alternative methods such as the Wilkinson shift and Gershgorin's Circle Theorem for better eigenvalue estimation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of eigenvalues and eigenvectors
  • Familiarity with matrix reduction techniques, specifically Hessenberg form
  • Knowledge of the QR algorithm and its limitations
  • Basic concepts of complex numbers and conjugate pairs
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the LAPACK routine dgeev.f for eigenvalue computation
  • Study the process of reducing matrices to Hessenberg form
  • Learn about the Wilkinson shift technique for eigenvalue estimation
  • Explore Gershgorin's Circle Theorem for eigenvalue localization
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, engineers, and computer scientists involved in numerical analysis, particularly those working with eigenvalue problems in real matrices.

photis
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Let A be a matrix with real elements. The problem is to estimate eigenvalues of A, real and complex. QR algorithm is fine for real eigenvalues, but obviously fails to converge on complex eigenvalues... So, I'm looking for an alternative that could provide an estimate for complex eigenvalues of A. Can anybody help?

Thanks,
photis
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Go to http://www.netlib.org/lapack/double/. The routine dgeev.f (a fortran subprogramme) is good and does not require complex arithmetic because you have a real matrix, so that all complex eigenvalues (if there are any) come in pairs of complex conjugates. I have used this routine successfully many many times in the past but I don't remember the details of the numerical method. Usually, the matrix has to be reduced to Hessenberg form first; then, I think there may be a variant of the QR algorithm that works. I found the discussions in "Numerical Recipes" by Press et al. and "Numerical methods that work" by F.S. Acton very imformative. Good luck---the world of non-symmetric matrices is not a pleasant place!

For more about the numerical procedure, look in
http://www.netlib.org/lapack/lug/node50.html
 
Last edited:
Thanks, your help was really valueable:!) . Following the links, I found this: http://www.acm.caltech.edu/~mlatini/research/qr_alg-feb04.pdf"

As eigenvalues come in conjugate pairs, QR apparently fails (no dominant eigenvalue exists). However, instead of generating a single eigenvalue estimation, QR produces a 2x2 matrix "containing" the conjugate pair. One can either (a) calculate the eigenvalues of the 2x2 matrix directly and proceed with next eigenvalue(s) or (b) use "Wilkinson shift" to move QR on the complex plain.

(a) may affect estimates of the remaining eigenvalues, but (b) introduces complex arithmetic, so (a) seems preferable. After all, I use QR to get reasonable initial approximations for inverse power algorithm.

Does anybody know if there is an alternative method (not QR) to ger Schur quasitriangular form of a real matrix?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
i have a matrix that its elements are complex ,ineed its eignvalue , did any onehave any subroutine for that?

(not double percision)
tnx
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
18K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K