Improving problem solving skills?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights a shift in mindset for a fourth-year undergraduate physics major, emphasizing the importance of problem-solving as a core aspect of learning physics. The initial approach of merely seeking answers and following patterns is acknowledged as insufficient for true understanding and enjoyment of the subject. Participants reflect on the mental processes involved in tackling problems, suggesting that experience and practice are crucial for improvement. The conversation references Richard Feynman, noting his unique attitude toward problem-solving, which stemmed from genuine curiosity rather than viewing challenges as mere tasks. This perspective fosters a more engaging and exhilarating approach to physics, suggesting that cultivating natural curiosity is essential for success in the field. Additionally, the analogy of chess is introduced as a means to enhance logical thinking and humility, further supporting the idea that a playful and inquisitive mindset is vital for effective problem-solving in physics and mathematics.
audreyh
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I'm a 4th year undergraduate physics major and I've realized too much of my college career have I just tried to get to the answer, copy example patterns, and look for a systematic way to solve problems. I realize this will get me nowhere; problem solving is where the physics fun is!

What sort of mental process do you go about when approaching problems?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1.Read question
2.Think very hard
3.Write down the answer
 
dontdisturbmycircles said:
1.Read question
2.Think very hard
3.Write down the answer

That only works when your name is Richard Feynman.

I realize this will get me nowhere; problem solving is where the physics fun is!

What sort of mental process do you go about when approaching problems?

IMO, experience and practice in solving problems is what makes you better at solving problems.
 
siddharth said:
That only works when your name is Richard Feynman.

You mean problems can't be solved by just thinking unless your name is Richard Feynman? :P (I know, the original quote is about Richard Feynman. :-P)
 
audreyh said:
What sort of mental process do you go about when approaching problems?

You mention problem solving and right away people think "Feynman".

My take on why he was so good at it was his attitude: he actually wanted to understand things to satisfy his own curiosity. He didn't view any of the myriad puzzles he solved during his life as "problems": irritating tasks to be fought with. To him all that kind of stuff was exiting, even exhilarating.

I am not sure a person can adopt that attitude artificially in order to be good at physics or math. The curiosity and exitement have to be natural.
 
Try chess. It opens your mind to all logical possibilities. It also exposes the chinks in your logical armor and humbles you. Can't ask much more from a simple game.
 
Just ONCE, I wanted to see a post titled Status Update that was not a blatant, annoying spam post by a new member. So here it is. Today was a good day here in Northern Wisconsin. Fall colors are here, no mosquitos, no deer flies, and mild temperature, so my morning run was unusually nice. Only two meetings today, and both went well. The deer that was road killed just down the road two weeks ago is now fully decomposed, so no more smell. Somebody has a spike buck skull for their...
Thread 'RIP George F. Smoot III (1945-2025)'
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Smoot https://physics.berkeley.edu/people/faculty/george-smoot-iii https://apc.u-paris.fr/fr/memory-george-fitzgerald-smoot-iii https://elements.lbl.gov/news/honoring-the-legacy-of-george-smoot/ https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2006/smoot/facts/ https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200611/nobel.cfm https://inspirehep.net/authors/988263 Structure in the COBE Differential Microwave Radiometer First-Year Maps (Astrophysical Journal...
Back
Top