How Does Kinetic Friction Affect Block Acceleration?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the acceleration of a block affected by kinetic friction when a force is applied at an angle. For part a, the acceleration is derived as a function of the applied force P, resulting in the equation a = 4165.001 + 0.001P. In part b, specific values for P (11.13 N and 22.26 N) are used to find the corresponding accelerations and frictional forces, with calculations yielding an acceleration of 14.206 m/s² for P = 11.13 N. Part c addresses determining the minimum acceleration when the block is on the verge of motion, suggesting the use of calculus for optimization. Overall, the thread seeks validation of the calculations and methodology used in solving the problem.
chocolatelover
Messages
238
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 425 g block is at rest on a horizontal surface. The coefficient of static friction between the block and the surface is .770, and the coefficient of kinetic friction is .220. A force of magnitude P pushes the block forward and downward. Assume the force is aplied at an angle of 40°

a. Assuming P is large enought to made the block move, find the acceleration of the block as a function of P (Use P as necessary and round numbers to the third decimal place)

b. If P=11.13 N and then P=22.26, find the accelerations and the frictional forces exerted on the block

c. What is the minimum acceleration for the block when P is a minimum and motion is just ready to begin?




Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



a. ΣFx=Pcosθ -f=ma
ΣFxy=N-mg-Psinθ=0

f=μN

Pcosθ-μΝ=ma

Pcosθ-μ(mg+sinθ)=ma

(cosθ/m)P-mg+(μsinθ/m)P

-mg+μsinθ/m +(cosθ/m)P=a

(-425g)(9.8m/s^2)+(.220sin40/425g)+(cos40/424)P=a

a=4165.001+.001P

b. P=11.13

a=4165.001+.001(11.13N)
4165.012

f=μΝ
N=(4165.012)(11.13)+425g(9.8m/s^2)

c. For part c. I was thinking about using Calculus to minimize the equation, would that work?

Could someone please tell me if this is correct so far and if it isn't could you please show me what to do?

Thank you very much
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Could someone please tell me if this looks correct?

a.
μs=.770
μk=.220

ΣFx=max

ΣFx=Pcos40-f
f=μkN
may=0
0=Σfy=N-mg-Py
=N-mg-Psin40
=Pcos40-[.220(mg+Psin40)]
ΣFx=max
Pcos40-.220(mg+psin40)=max
pcos40/.425kg-.220(.425(9.8)+psin40)/.425=ax
1.47p-2.155=ax

b.P=11.13N
1.47(11.13N)-2.155=ax
ax=14.206m/s^2

f=μkN

=.220(9.8m/s^2)
f=2.156

c. I would then do the same thing for part c, right?

Thank you very much
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top