Determinants and Cramer's Rule

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding determinants and Cramer's Rule, emphasizing that adding a multiple of one row to another does not change the determinant's value. A specific example is provided with a matrix, demonstrating the effects of factoring and column operations on the determinant. The user encounters confusion regarding the subtraction of columns, particularly the signs of the resulting values. Clarification is sought on the process of subtracting one column from another, highlighting the importance of correctly interpreting the operations. The conversation underscores the complexities involved in manipulating determinants and applying Cramer's Rule effectively.
rocomath
Messages
1,752
Reaction score
1
I'm trying to learn about Determinants and Cramer's Rule.

If a multiple of one row is added to another row, the value of the determinant is not changed. This applies to columns, also.

15 14 16
18 17 32
21 20 42

Factoring a 3 from C1 and a 2 from C3 =

6 times

5 14 13
6 17 13
7 20 21

Now subtracting C3 from C2 =

6 times

5 1 13
6 1 16
7 -1 21

So, C3-C2. Why isn't C2 ...

13-14 = -1
16-17 = -1
21-20 = 1

I notice it's just opposite signs, but where does the -1 multiple come from.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Uh! Ok it says "subtract the third column from the second column" meaning C2-C3.
 
Since ##px^9+q## is the factor, then ##x^9=\frac{-q}{p}## will be one of the roots. Let ##f(x)=27x^{18}+bx^9+70##, then: $$27\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)^2+b\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)+70=0$$ $$b=27 \frac{q}{p}+70 \frac{p}{q}$$ $$b=\frac{27q^2+70p^2}{pq}$$ From this expression, it looks like there is no greatest value of ##b## because increasing the value of ##p## and ##q## will also increase the value of ##b##. How to find the greatest value of ##b##? Thanks
I tried to combine those 2 formulas but it didn't work. I tried using another case where there are 2 red balls and 2 blue balls only so when combining the formula I got ##\frac{(4-1)!}{2!2!}=\frac{3}{2}## which does not make sense. Is there any formula to calculate cyclic permutation of identical objects or I have to do it by listing all the possibilities? Thanks

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top