News I'd like to tell you about the nation's richest practicing lawyer

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 5645
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    lawyer
AI Thread Summary
Walter Umphrey, a lawyer from Texas, gained significant wealth from a tobacco lawsuit settlement, which totaled $17.3 billion for victims. Initially, lawyers were to receive 15% of the settlement, but they later requested an astonishing $25 billion in fees, which would be 154% of what the victims received. Ultimately, five law firms were awarded $3.3 billion in fees, funded by taxpayer money, raising serious ethical concerns about the legal system. The decision on fees was influenced by a panel that included both trial lawyers and representatives from cigarette companies, leading to questions about conflicts of interest. The Attorney General at the time, who selected the law firms, faced legal repercussions and prison time for his role in the scandal, while the law firms involved have not been charged with any wrongdoing. This situation highlights the potential for abuse within the legal system and the need for fairness in how legal fees are determined.
member 5645
He lives in my town (a town of about 150,000) about an hour from Houston, TX.
I knew the guy had a lot of money from Asbestos cases in the 80's, but recently came across where his latest money came from:

I'll walk you through the history:


Here is the case. Tabacco lawsuit. The man's name is Walter Umphrey, and his firm, with four others, represented Texas in the lawsuits.
http://www.cnn.com/US/9801/16/texas.tobacco.late/

The settlement came to 17.3 BILLION dollars for the victims of tobacco.
The lawyers, in the beginning, agreed to be paid 15%, but with such a high settlement no one though that would actually happen - I mean, BILLIONS in lawyers fees? That would be paid by the state?? NO WAY!

Even the Attorney General said it was 'laughable'
Morales said it was "laughable" to speculate that the lawyers' fees would be in the billions of dollars, but added that whatever they get was well-earned.

He said the state could not have hoped to combat the industry attorneys without the help of the private firms. The industry's lawyers, he said, spent $200 million preparing their defense.

So then things went to court to figure out if they should get the whole 15% or not
How much to pay the lawyers has not been determined. The state and the firms had agreed that the lawyers would receive 15 percent of a jury award, but have now agreed to let the court decide the fees in light of the settlement.


Well, what happened there?!

The attorneys request, not the 15%, but in a closed door meeting TWENTY FIVE (25) BILLION dollars as lawyers fees. That's right, they asked for 154% of what the victims of the largest settlement in the history of the US got.
Surely this wouldn't be done. Surely this would be laughed right out - after all, Mr. Morales, did say it was laughable thatit would even be in the billions!
http://www.tobacco.org/news/12419.html


Well, 5 firms split the share of 3.3 BILLION dollars! Paid to them at 100 million a year, until completion. What happened to the original 15% mark?!
http://www.jeremiahproject.com/smoke/rt9812.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Now, 3.3 BILLION dollars is a lot of money. Especially since the Tobacco companies could only pay 14 billion, and the ENTIRE amount of lawyers fees are being paid by the state - yes, tax money to pay this insane fee!

How could this be, who would allow this to happen!? Why?!

Well first off, let's see how the fees were decided:
The panel was appointed by cigarette makers and a group of trial lawyers to decide fees for lawyers representing states that settled suits with the tobacco industry

So trial lawyers help pick dollar amount that other trial lawyers get paid?! Brilliant!

Oh yes, Mr. Morales, what happened to the guy who said such fees were laughable!?? What possible connection could he have to these lawyers??

Well first off, Morales, as the Attorney general, was responsible for choosing the 5 firms.

Then no one seemed to mind at the time that all 5 lawyers firms donated money to Morales potlical campaign fund (including Mr. Umphrey at 1.1 million dollars to Morales party, and 16,000 to Morales himself)


4 years later, in 2002, an investigation finally came together to bring this to court
http://www.texansforreasonablelegalfees.com/fee.asp



It is now 2004 Morales has been since idicted and sent to prison for a whopping 4 years.
He recently sent a letter to the state government (now Republican controlled) asking them to investigate the 1998 tobacco trial. Due to a protective order, he didn't say exactly what to look for, but has pointed the state towards "the tobacco five".
http://news.mysanantonio.com/story.cfm?xla=saen&xlb=180&xlc=1102402




So, here we stand today, and not a single one of the 5 firms that received the fees has been charged with anything. However, Morales and several of his buddies have all been sent to prison. Apparently Mr. Umphrey, and now the others, have enough money to keep this tied up for quite a while.

I don't have a huge point to this thread, except that I find it horribly disgusting, and amazing that the firms were ever able to get their hands on such an amount of money in the first place. I am just staggered by it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:


Wow, that is certainly an impressive and eye-opening story. It is incredible to think that a single lawyer and his firm could make billions of dollars from a single case. It is also concerning to see how the original agreement of 15% was completely disregarded and the lawyers ended up receiving over 150% of what the victims received in the settlement. This raises questions about the ethics and fairness of the legal system, and the power and influence of certain lawyers and firms. It is important to ensure that justice is served for victims, but it is also important for the legal system to be fair and just in all aspects. Thank you for sharing this information and bringing attention to this issue.
 
Just ONCE, I wanted to see a post titled Status Update that was not a blatant, annoying spam post by a new member. So here it is. Today was a good day here in Northern Wisconsin. Fall colors are here, no mosquitos, no deer flies, and mild temperature, so my morning run was unusually nice. Only two meetings today, and both went well. The deer that was road killed just down the road two weeks ago is now fully decomposed, so no more smell. Somebody has a spike buck skull for their...
Thread 'In the early days of electricity, they didn't have wall plugs'
Hello scientists, engineers, etc. I have not had any questions for you recently, so have not participated here. I was scanning some material and ran across these 2 ads. I had posted them at another forum, and I thought you may be interested in them as well. History is fascinating stuff! Some houses may have had plugs, but many homes just screwed the appliance into the light socket overhead. Does anyone know when electric wall plugs were in widespread use? 1906 ad DDTJRAC Even big...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
10K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
6K
Replies
65
Views
10K
Back
Top