Register to reply

Is 0.999repeating 1?

by killerinstinct
Tags: repeating
Share this thread:
killerinstinct
#1
May28-04, 02:11 PM
P: 88
Very common debate: is 0.999999 repeating 1?
Opinions?
Phys.Org News Partner Mathematics news on Phys.org
Heat distributions help researchers to understand curved space
Professor quantifies how 'one thing leads to another'
Team announces construction of a formal computer-verified proof of the Kepler conjecture
killerinstinct
#2
May28-04, 02:16 PM
P: 88
didn't realize that there was anther exactly the same question in logics thread.
Bob3141592
#3
May28-04, 02:21 PM
P: 226
Quote Quote by killerinstinct
Very common debate: is 0.999999 repeating 1?
Opinions?
Yes, it is, as long as we're talking about the normal real number system. I can't see any difference. Except for the typography.

What is the difference, meaning subtract .999... from 1.000.... The difference would be 0.000...1. But it's not valid to put something after the "..." That's asking what comes after infinity, which isn't a valid question. The expression .000...1 is a typographic error, and not something that is even defined in the set of real numbers.

matt grime
#4
May28-04, 02:54 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 9,396
Is 0.999repeating 1?

It is not an opinion that they are equal, it is a very easy provable fact and only cranks who don't understand the way mathematics work insist they are different after it has been patiently explained to them.

We mean base ten, work out what the infinite sum 0.999... is, if that doesn't convince you then you need to look up the definitions you don't understand in the phrase:

they represent the same equivalence class in the cauchy sequences of rationals modulo convergence that define the real number system.
jcsd
#5
May28-04, 03:01 PM
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 2,226
Well I'm 99.99999.....% certain it's equal to 1 :D
JonF
#6
May28-04, 03:03 PM
P: 617
This has to be the most asked question on this forum.
jcsd
#7
May28-04, 03:08 PM
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 2,226
Quote Quote by JonF
This has to be the most asked question on this forum.
JonF I have never been on any mesage board where there have not been arguments about this and that includes non-maths/sci boards.

In fact I now propose jcsd's theorum:

On any bulletin board, no matter the subject area of that board, sooner rather than later someone will argue that 0.99.. is not equal to one.
JonF
#8
May28-04, 03:10 PM
P: 617
.999… not equal to 1? That’s kiddy stuff, just watch me argue that .3333… is not equal to 1/3
matt grime
#9
May28-04, 03:13 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 9,396
Corollary to JCSD's theorem:

every bulletin board etc attracts an idiot, a troll, or possibly both.
Grizzlycomet
#10
May28-04, 05:01 PM
P: 43
Why should .9999... equal 1 and not .9999...? Trying to get from .9999... to 1 is just like trying to accelerate your spaceship to the speed of light. You keep getting closer, but you can't get that last little bit.
Integral
#11
May28-04, 05:14 PM
Mentor
Integral's Avatar
P: 7,318
I knew it.^~ A last little bit poster would have to show up. Do we try to explain it to him?

That "last little bit" is [tex] \frac 1
\infty [/tex]. By the definition of infinity, that last little bit is zero. So essentially this is true by definition, but beyond that it is completely consistent and provable in many different manners. There is no law that says each point on the real number line must have a unique representation. In fact just the opposite is true, every point on the real number line has many (perhaps an infinite) number of different ways to represent it.
Grizzlycomet
#12
May28-04, 05:28 PM
P: 43
Quote Quote by Integral
I knew it.^~ A last little bit poster would have to show up. Do we try to explain it to him?
I must say I dislike these kind of comments. I am a 16 yr old student who has not taken a lot of math, certainly not on the subject of infinity. I fail to see why you would judge me as "a last little bit poster" or whatnot, for simply voicing a (to me) logical view. Though these thing may be obvious to you, that is not so for everyone. I find that your post without the two first lines would have been completely satisfactory.
hello3719
#13
May28-04, 05:45 PM
P: 132
Eyes can trick your mind.
Integral
#14
May28-04, 05:48 PM
Mentor
Integral's Avatar
P: 7,318
My apologies, having been involved in this same discussion on several different forums over the last 2 or 3 years I do not recall anyone ever saying "oh I see" so perhaps am a bit cyncial about the whole issue.
jcsd
#15
May28-04, 05:50 PM
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 2,226
Quote Quote by Grizzlycomet
I must say I dislike these kind of comments. I am a 16 yr old student who has not taken a lot of math, certainly not on the subject of infinity. I fail to see why you would judge me as "a last little bit poster" or whatnot, for simply voicing a (to me) logical view. Though these thing may be obvious to you, that is not so for everyone. I find that your post without the two first lines would have been completely satisfactory.
Just follow this:

let x = 0.9999... =>

10x = 9.99999...

10x - x = 9x = 9 =>

x = 1


All we are really saying is:

[tex]\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{9}{10^n} = 1[/tex]
ahrkron
#16
May28-04, 05:52 PM
Emeritus
PF Gold
P: 734
I'm sorry for the harsh response to your question, Grizzlycomet. We generally try to not be hard on people because of the questions they ask; the problem is that this particular topic is visited way too often by people trying to push their "new math", "theory of infinity" and whatnot, instead of trying first to understand how standard math deals with the issue.
Grizzlycomet
#17
May28-04, 05:55 PM
P: 43
Quote Quote by Integral
My apologies, having been involved in this same discussion on several different forums over the last 2 or 3 years I do not recall anyone ever saying "oh I see" so perhaps am a bit cyncial about the whole issue.
Thank you, apology accepted :) I understand that you may have seen this question many times, thus growing very tired of it. Your explanation was in itself good :)
Integral
#18
May28-04, 06:06 PM
Mentor
Integral's Avatar
P: 7,318
Read this page. There are 2 proofs, the first simply uses the sum of an infinite series formula. The second is my version of how a Mathematician approaches the problem. I feel that it also gives a very intuitive feel for why equality holds.


Register to reply