What Wavelengths Are Missing in the Reflected Light from a Thin Film Coating?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining which visible wavelengths are missing in the reflected light from a thin film coating with a refractive index of 1.37 on glass. It highlights the importance of understanding constructive and destructive interference, noting that a phase change of pi occurs when light reflects off a surface with a higher refractive index. The conversation clarifies that the phase difference between reflected waves is influenced by both phase changes upon reflection and path length differences. Participants emphasize that the terms "missing" and "enhanced" relate to destructive and constructive interference, respectively. Understanding these concepts is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
lha08
Messages
158
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A coating of film n=1.37 on glass slabs (n=1.6) is 8.45X10^-5 cm thick.If white light is incident normally, which visible wavelengths are missing in the reflected light? White light containing wavelengths from 400 to 700 nm.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I know how to solve for the answer but how am i supposed to know whether it is constructive and destructive? Also, what does the phase changes mean (e.g. pi and 0) and does it have any importance when i solve for the answer?? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lha08 said:
I know how to solve for the answer but how am i supposed to know whether it is constructive and destructive?
Note that the problem asks about wavelengths that are missing in the reflected light.
Also, what does the phase changes mean (e.g. pi and 0) and does it have any importance when i solve for the answer??
When light reflects off of a surface with a higher index of refraction, there's a phase change of pi. So, in this case, both reflections get the same phase change.
 
Doc Al said:
Note that the problem asks about wavelengths that are missing in the reflected light.

When light reflects off of a surface with a higher index of refraction, there's a phase change of pi. So, in this case, both reflections get the same phase change.
So, does that mean that it depends on whether if they use "missing" or "enhanced" that allow us to determine if it's constructive or destructive? missing=destructive enhanced=constructive?

I'm not really sure but if i was to graph this, would i ultimately have 2 sinusoidal functions where the first function would have a phase change of pi and the second one with pi as well? so it would just look like a single function that begins at pi?
Thanks a lot.
 
lha08 said:
So, does that mean that it depends on whether if they use "missing" or "enhanced" that allow us to determine if it's constructive or destructive? missing=destructive enhanced=constructive?
That's right.
I'm not really sure but if i was to graph this, would i ultimately have 2 sinusoidal functions where the first function would have a phase change of pi and the second one with pi as well? so it would just look like a single function that begins at pi?
What matters is the phase difference between the reflected waves. That difference has two sources: (1) phase change upon reflection, and (2) path length differences. Since (1) is the same for both waves, all you need to worry about is (2).
 
What matters is the phase difference between the reflected waves. That difference has two sources: (1) phase change upon reflection, and (2) path length differences. Since (1) is the same for both waves, all you need to worry about is (2).
Is the phase change and the path difference the same thing except that phase change is in radians and path difference is in meters? Other than that, I'm not really certain what the difference between the two really is..
 
lha08 said:
Is the phase change and the path difference the same thing except that phase change is in radians and path difference is in meters? Other than that, I'm not really certain what the difference between the two really is..
The phase change upon reflection has nothing to do with path length difference, but both factors together determine the phase difference (measured in radians) between the reflected waves. The path length difference is due to one of the reflected waves traveling a longer distance since it goes back and forth through the thin film; that extra distance translates into a phase difference.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top