Which textbook is best for self-studying Physics for the SAT II exam?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pi Face
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Physics
AI Thread Summary
A rising junior is preparing to take the Physics SAT II at the end of the year but needs to self-study due to scheduling conflicts. They have found the Princeton Review book insufficient and are seeking a more comprehensive resource. The school's textbook, Holt Physics by Serway and Faughn, is not an option since they won't be taking the class. Suggestions include exploring the Isaac Asimov physics book, which is considered engaging and informative. Additionally, obtaining old homework and exams from a physics teacher for practice is recommended.
Pi Face
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
I wasn't really sure where to put this topic, so feel free to move this if needed.

Anyways, I'm a rising Junior (HS) right now, and would like to take the Physics SAT II at the end of my Junior year. The thing is, I would have to self study because of a scheduling conflict. I took an Intro Physics my freshman year, but I forgot most of what I learned. I bought the Princeton Review Physics SAT II book and started working through it, but it isn't in depth enough and some parts left me confused. I also looked through the notes on the Sparknotes website, but I think I may need a little more review.

The book my school uses is Holt Physics by Serway and Faughn, published by Holt Rinehart Winston, 2002 edition. ISBN is 0-030-56544-8 if it matters. I figured that since I won't be taking the class in school, I don't have to buy the school's book and would have the entire selection of physics textbooks to choose from. I'm looking for a book that will thoroughly cover the topics found on a SAT II Physics test, or in any ol' Honors Physics class. I'll be taking Physics C my senior year as well. My math background is pretty strong, so the math portion won't be hard, it's really just the physics concepts, so I'd prefer the book to be beginner-friendly/introductory. Anyone have any suggestions on what book to get? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0880292512/?tag=pfamazon01-20 by Isaac Asimov
This is definitely a non-standard book, and I don't know if it is too easy or hard, as I haven't read it myself. I have actually recently ordered it to check it out, and Amazon has it for cheap if you get it used. I think it is worth checking out. I would have loved to read a book like this before I started out, and it is most definitely going to be more interesting than reading some high school approved physics textbook. You (and I both!) should learn a lot from it. Just to be clear, it is definitely a physics book, not just a simple layman book (Asimov wrote I, Robot and many other science fiction books.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The suggestion of the Isaac Asimov book for review is a good one.

Perhaps your Physics teacher could give you some old homeworks and exams for practice. Save the practice SAT tests for last so you can get a good feel for how you're doing.

I don't know if the Physics SAT prep books have gotten any better. They were crap 20 years ago.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
39
Views
7K
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Back
Top