How do you isolate a variable in a function such as this

  • Thread starter Thread starter Storm Butler
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Variable
AI Thread Summary
To isolate a variable in the equation x^4+y^4+z^4+(4x^2)*(y^2)*(z^2)-34=0, one approach is to treat it as a polynomial in z. By substituting w=z^2, the equation can be transformed into a quadratic form, which can then be solved using the quadratic formula to find two solutions in terms of x and y. However, isolating z explicitly in terms of x and y may not always be possible due to the nature of the function. The discussion highlights that very few functions of three variables can be reduced to a simple form like z=f(x)g(y). There is curiosity about whether there is a proof regarding the conditions under which such reductions are possible.
Storm Butler
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
x^4+y^4+z^4+(4x^2)*(y^2)*(z^2)-34=0
I've tried all sorts of things factoring, algebraic manipulation ect. but i don't get how you could isolate a variable for a function like this i.e z= f(x,y).
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You may not be able express one variable explicitly in terms of the other two.
 
Everything seems to be raised to powers of two. Therefore for some variable say x, replace x^2 with w, and then find w using the quadratic equation.
 
Storm Butler said:
x^4+y^4+z^4+(4x^2)*(y^2)*(z^2)-34=0
I've tried all sorts of things factoring, algebraic manipulation ect. but i don't get how you could isolate a variable for a function like this i.e z= f(x,y).
If you want to solve for z (isolate z), treat it as a polynomial is z. For example, write it as z^4+ [4x^2y^2]z^2+ [x^4+ y^4- 34]= 0
That's a fourth degree equation but, as John Chrieto suggests, since it has only even powers of z, letting w= z^2 gives w^2+ [4x^2y^2]w+ [x^4+ y^4- 34]= 0, a quadratic equation that can be solved using the quadratic formula- giving two solutions in terms of x and y. Then you can take the two square roots of each of those to give the four solutions to the fourth degree equation.
 
wow thank you guys you went well and beyond what i was thinking i didnt even think to substitute any of the squared variables and solve as a qudratic. Great insight/ intellegence.
 
ok so i tried doing that but i get stuck at this point: i did w^2+w*u+v=0 where w=z^2 and u and v are both equal to the separated "clump" functions. then i plug the variables into the quadratic equation and substitute and i get radical (x^4*(4y^4-1)-y^2-34)-2x^2*y^2 i don't get how you get two functions one in x and one in y.
 
Why do you think you should?

Very few functions of 3 variables can be reduce to "z= f(x)g(y)".
 
idk i just wasn't sure if i was doing something wrong or if i missed a step, also is your not the only one to say that I am curious is it just a general assumption or is there a proof for different classes of functions that tells if they can be reduced to z=f(x)y(x) ?
 
Back
Top