Mean velocity for parabolic velocity profile

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the mean velocity in laminar fluid flow devices with a parabolic velocity profile. The user is attempting to derive the relationship between mean velocity and maximum velocity, believing it should be u[mean]=0.5*u[max], but instead arrives at u[mean]=(2/3)*u[max]. The user integrates the velocity profile equation but is unsure where the mistake lies in their calculations. The community confirms that the user's result is indeed correct, indicating that the mean velocity for a parabolic profile in a wide channel does yield u[mean]=(2/3)*u[max]. This highlights a common misunderstanding regarding the expected mean velocity in such flow scenarios.
stephenx_86
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm making laminar fluid flow devices and want to be able to calculate the velocity as a function of distance from the channel edges. As the channels are relatively wide compared to their height I'm treating the effect of the parabolic velocity profile as negligible in the horizontal plane (i.e. uniform velocity horizontally). I can measure the average velocity across a plane perpendicular to the direction of flow (from the flow rate), but can't seem to derive the expression that relates mean velocity and maximum velocity (which I believe should be u[mean]=0.5*u[max]). I'm sure I'm probably making a really basic mistake, but here's my working, which ends up giving me u[mean]=(2/3)*u[max]

Where u is the velocity as a function of position relative to the channel centre; r is the distance from the channel centre and R is maximum distance from the channel centre (i.e. the channel is 2*R) wide.

u=u[max]*(1-(r/R)^2)

integrate to give:

u[net] = u[max]*(r-(r^3)/(3*(R^2)))

evaluate between R and -R to give:

u[net] = u[max]*(4/3)*R

divide by the channel width to give the average velocity (u[mean])

u[mean] = 2/3*u[max]

If anyone could tell me where I'm going wrong I'd be really greatful, as I can't see why I don't end up with u[mean]=1/2*u[max], which is what I keep getting for the relationship when I look it up online.

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
your result is correct
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top